Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Defer final iputs for dirty-time inodes in PF_MEMALLOC context

[Christian Brauner]

> Thanks for your patches. I've actually submitted patches to address this
> problem back at the end of April [1]. In particularly the problem you
> report was addressed somewhat differently by patch 1. We've then discussed
> them at LSF/MM/BPF summit and people mostly agreed with the approach, just
> there were some requests for better parallelization of deferred inode
> reclaim (which I so far failed to implement). But it's currently high on my
> todo list so I should hopefully send v2 of the patches for the next merge
> window.

Thanks for working on this. This is good to hear! :)