Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] proc/task_mmu: remove unnecessary helpers

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 9/11/26 16:28, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 3:52 AM David Hildenbrand (Arm)
> <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/11/26 01:47, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>>> When per-vma locks were behind a config option, a number of helper
>>> functions were needed to simplify the locking code. Now that these
>>> locks are universally available, we can do a little cleanup.
>>> Remove lock_vma_range(), unlock_vma_range(), query_vma_setup(),
>>> query_vma_teardown() helpers.
>>>
>>> No functional change intended.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett (Oracle) <liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> I think you CCed me only on this mail correctly (the other ones went to my old
>> RH address, I thought that one would bounce)
> 
> Oh, man! I used an old list of recipients :/
> Should I resend to avoid bounces? So far I haven't seen any bounces
> even from the previous version which also used the RH address.

Odd, I thought it bounced for a while (maybe it has a new proud owner, who
knows, haha).

I changed Monday my mail filters to not catch to/bc to the RH address when also
CCing a mailing list ... assuming everybody got annoyed of the bounces.

I just reverted that change, so I'll just fish the mails out of the mailing list
folder and should also get replies to the other mails into my inbox.

-- 
Cheers,

David