Re: [PATCH 01/14] genirq: fix typos in comments

From: Radu Rendec

Date: Sun Sep 13 2026 - 14:13:37 EST


On Mon, 2026-09-07 at 12:23 +0530, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> Fix typos in comments, reported by scripts/checkpatch.pl using the
> misspelling list in scripts/spelling.txt.  Only touches comments, no code
> changes.
>
> Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Hemanth Selam <hemanth.selam@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/msi.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index fb5f372215bf..b22d74496af1 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int msi_insert_desc(struct device *dev, struct msi_desc *desc,
>   * insert it at @init_desc->msi_index
>   *
>   * @dev: Pointer to the device for which the descriptor is allocated
> - * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain to which the desriptor is added
> + * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain to which the descriptor is added
>   * @init_desc: Pointer to an MSI descriptor to initialize the new descriptor
>   *
>   * Return: 0 on success or an appropriate failure code.
> @@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(msi_domain_first_desc);
>   * @domid: The id of the interrupt domain which should be walked.
>   * @filter: Descriptor state filter
>   *
> - * The first invocation of msi_next_desc() has to be preceeded by a
> + * The first invocation of msi_next_desc() has to be preceded by a
>   * successful invocation of __msi_first_desc(). Consecutive invocations are
>   * only valid if the previous one was successful. All these operations have
>   * to be done within the same MSI mutex held region.

Thanks for the patch. For your next patch series, please send all the
patches in the series in a single git-send-email command and make sure
email threads are enabled. That way, all the patches in the series will
be grouped, both on lore.kernel.org and in people's mailboxes.

I tried to look up the thread on lore.kernel.org to see if the entire
series consisted solely of typo fixes. I couldn't. But then I
accidentally searched just for "typo" and noticed you had sent many of
these, across multiple subsystems. So I guess I have my answer.

Anyway, the patch itself looks good, so...

Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@xxxxxxxxxx>