Re: [PATCH v4] mm/page_alloc: avoid direct compaction for costly __GFP_NORETRY allocations

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:58:29 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Unless I'm mistaken about that MIGRATE_HIGHATOMIC part, it seems all sashiko
> > concerns can be dismissed and then indeed v4 is the better version.
> 
> It looks like a real issue to me, but one that already exists
> independent of Salvatore's change.

So I'm hearing that I should drop v5 and revert to v4?