Re: [PATCH net v2 4/5] vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket
From: netdev-bot+sashiko
Date: Wed Sep 16 2026 - 19:43:36 EST
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0 (1)
- [Medium] Undocumented change of connect()'s return value / sk_err
consumption for an already-established socket.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Low] Reported gap (validated as resolved later in this series,
therefore discarded): at this commit vsock_connect() keys its "do not…
--
vsock: Do not reset a TCP_CLOSING socket
This teaches the vsock_connect() wait loop about the TCP_ESTABLISHED ->
TCP_CLOSING transition triggered by VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST, so a socket that
is still linked in vsock_connected_table is not reset behind the receive
path's back. It also rewrites the tail of vsock_connect() and drops a
stale comment.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/anzT1fREOSyHT99k@v4bel/
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> index 499e902becfad..adf3f018347ea 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1834,23 +1833,22 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> - /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
> - * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
> + /* Connection was established. Whatever happens to socket once
> + * we release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
> * into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
> *
> * Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
> * here is racy and insecure.
> */
> - if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
> - break;
> + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ||
> + sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSING) {
> + err = 0;
> + goto out_wait;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
The old code did a plain break here, so control fell through to the
err = sock_error(sk) tail. Now it jumps straight to out_wait with err = 0.
Combined with the tail change below, does this mean a blocking connect()
that wakes up in TCP_ESTABLISHED with sk_err already set now returns 0
instead of that error, leaving sk_err queued for the next send()/recv()?
That window looks reachable via virtio_transport_recv_connected(), which
runs only for TCP_ESTABLISHED sockets:
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:virtio_transport_recv_connected() {
case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW:
if (!virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(vsk, skb)) {
...
(void)virtio_transport_reset(vsk, skb);
virtio_transport_do_close(vsk, true);
sk->sk_err = ENOBUFS;
...
}
and virtio_transport_do_close() only downgrades the state when the receive
queue is empty:
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c:virtio_transport_do_close() {
WRITE_ONCE(vsk->peer_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK);
if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0)
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSING;
...
}
In the queue-full case vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) > 0, so sk_state stays
TCP_ESTABLISHED while sk_err == ENOBUFS.
The changelog mentions only the TCP_CLOSING transition plus "Drop the
redundant err=0 and the inaccurate comment above signal_pending()". Could
the changelog also spell out that connect() no longer reports or consumes a
pending sk_err for an established socket? The patch carries a Fixes:
d021c344051a tag, so it is a backport candidate and the user-visible change
of the connect() return value seems worth documenting.
>
> /* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
> * to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
> * to retry.
> - *
> - * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
> - * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
> - * assigned.
> */
> if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
> err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : sock_intr_errno(timeout);
[ ... ]
> @@ -1874,8 +1872,8 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> }
>
> - err = sock_error(sk);
> - if (err) {
> + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED && sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSING) {
> + err = sock_error(sk);
> sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
> sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
> }
[Severity: Low]
This is a pre-existing issue and not introduced by this patch, but the new
whitelist covers only TCP_ESTABLISHED and TCP_CLOSING. A socket that is
still linked in vsock_connected_table but was moved to TCP_CLOSE by a
lockless event handler still gets reset to SS_UNCONNECTED both here and in
the signal_pending() branch above.
Two writers do that without calling vsock_remove_connected():
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c:virtio_vsock_reset_sock() {
vsk->peer_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
sk_error_report(sk);
}
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c:vmci_transport_handle_detach() {
WRITE_ONCE(vsk->peer_shutdown, SHUTDOWN_MASK);
...
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
}
With sock->state == SS_UNCONNECTED, a retry connect() takes the default:
branch, vsock_assign_transport() returns early because the transport is
unchanged, transport->connect() is re-issued, and the next RESPONSE reaches
__vsock_insert_connected():
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:__vsock_insert_connected() {
sock_hold(&vsk->sk);
list_add(&vsk->connected_table, list);
}
which is the same list_add double add BUG quoted in the changelog, plus a
leaked struct sock reference.
For the record, this appears to be closed by the next patch in the series,
"vsock: Handle sudden TCP_CLOSE during connect", which adds
/* Virtio/PM events are serviced locklessly. */
if (READ_ONCE(vsk->peer_shutdown)) {
err = -ECONNRESET;
goto out;
}
to the same default: branch, and every writer above sets
peer_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK before moving the socket to TCP_CLOSE, so no
action seems needed on the series as a whole. Would it be worth noting in
this patch's changelog that the TCP_CLOSE variant of the same race is
handled by the following patch?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260915-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v2-0-a1d9abb472f7%40rbox.co