Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: axis-fifo: Added missing binding

[Daniel Matyas]

On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:58:14 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 02:48:48PM +0300, Daniel Matyas wrote:
> > From: Daniel Matyas <matyasdaniel005@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.txt file described how the
> > devicetree of the driver should look like. Convert it to .yaml file.
> > Issue found by checkpatch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Matyas <matyasdaniel005@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Matyas <matyasdaniel006@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Why twice?
> 

Lost access to the first email temporarily. Should I just remove the original email?

> > ---
> > 
> > Sorry for adding another email. I got locked out of the first one for 30
> > days...
> > 
> > v2: Corrected syntax errors in compatible:
> > 	xlnx,axis-fifo-mm-s-4.1 -> xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s-4.1
> > 	xlnx,axis-fifo-mm-s-4.2 -> xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s-4.2
> > 	xlnx,axis-fifo-mm-s-4.3 -> xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s-4.3
> > 
> >  .../axis-fifo/xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s.yaml         | 257 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 257 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/axis-fifo/xlnx,axi-fifo-mm-s.yaml
> 
> staging drivers need to be stand-alone, in the drivers/staging/
> directory, please keep these files there.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Does this mean that the staging drivers do not need a devicetree? Should I just
drop this patch entirely?

Thank you,

Daniel M

Sent using hkml (https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail)