Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] remoteproc: add support for any virtio device

From: Mathieu Poirier

Date: Fri Sep 18 2026 - 12:55:13 EST


Hi Francesco,

I have started reviewing this set but given the size and implications, it will
take me a few days to get through.

Thanks,
Mathieu


On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 11:10:45PM +0200, Francesco Valla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch series introduces the possibility to support generic virtio
> devices over the remotepoc transport, whereas today only rpmsg and
> virtio-console are supported.
>
> == Introduction ==
>
> Support for devices other than rpmsg was originally planned [1] and is
> declared inside the documentation [2], but is in practice not there for
> the majority of (if not all) the platforms that provide remoteproc
> capabilities due to memory allocation.
>
> While vrings are pre-allocated in an area that is reachable by both the
> local (i.e.; Linux) and remote processors, buffers produced by virtio
> drivers aren't, since they typically get allocated through kmalloc.
> The aforementioned rpmsg and virtio-console drivers instead use a trick
> to overcome this limitation and allocate these buffers directly from
> the remoteproc device's coherent memory area, somewhat breaking the
> separation between the driver and the underlying transport.
>
> == Well, nice, but why? ==
>
> Main usecase is sharing/virtualization of devices in hypervisor-less
> mixed-criticality contexts, where a subset of peripherals are controlled
> by a "safety" real-time processor but still need to be used by the Linux
> world. Several solutions have been / are being proposed [3] [4], but
> none of them re-uses the existing, standardized virtio specifications.
>
> == The proposal ==
>
> The proposed approach is to introduce a bounce buffering mechanism that
> is transparent to the drivers and can expose to remoteproc devices only
> memory areas they can access. This is obtained by defining the .map
> memeber of each registered vdev and use the map() and unmap() callback
> to bounce data to and from the remote processor, just like the swiotlb
> framework is doing in other contexts, using the device's coherent memory
> area and the associated functions to allocate the bounce buffers.
>
> During the map() callback the address of the incoming buffer is compared
> against the coherent memory address base and size, to pass through
> buffers already suitable for remoteproc usage (e.g.: the ones allocated
> by the rpmsg framework).
>
> == Status and open points ==
>
> The series was tested against a custom Zephyr application [5] running on
> the Cortex-M33 processor of an i.MX93 and exposing six different virtio
> devices:
>
> - rpmsg
> - entropy (rng)
> - gpio
> - i2c
> - spi
> - can
>
> On top of three of them (unsurprisingly: i2c, spi, and gpio) several
> devices where declared inside Linux devicetree and successfully used
> (well, technically I'm still experiencing difficulties with gpio
> interrupts not firing on the M33, but that's not really related to the
> series).
>
> Several open points are still present, and needs to be either
> investigated or discussed:
>
> - for each bounce buffer an entire page is allocated from the coherent
> memory pool; this is a waste for most of the allocations, which take
> on average 32 to 64 bytes. An option can be to initialize a DMA pool
> on one page and allocate small buffers from it?
>
> - the support in its current form allocates more memory than before
> (for bounce buffer tracking) also for existing usecases (i.e.,
> mainly rpmsg).
>
> - an additional issue still exist - and is not solved by this series -
> for a subset of virtio devices: communication through the device's
> config space. The remoteproc transport expects this config space to
> be somewhat constant, and there is no provision to sync changes made
> by the driver with the remote device. This prevents e.g.
> virtio-input to work.
>
> - device de-registration on remoteproc stop is causing oopses (under
> investigation - might no be strictly tied to the series)
>
> == Patches breakdown ==
>
> Patches 1 and 2 are cleanups to the remoteproc-virtio driver and could
> be applied independently of this series.
>
> Patch 3 was submitted a couple of months ago [6] and paves the road for
> the actual support of generic virtio devices, removing the fixed number
> of 2 for the vrings associated to a vdev.
>
> Patch 4 introduces two new APIs for coherent memory areas associated to
> devices that are used later.
>
> Patch 5 might somewhat be controversial, as it unconditionally defines
> the VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature for all vdevs. This is required to
> support some virtio device types, and there is no other mean of
> defining it, since the field reserved for features inside the resource
> table is limited to 32 bits. Given that the 1.x virtio specifications
> are ~10 years old this still seems reasonable.
>
> Patch 6 is were the bounce buffering mechanism is introduced; another
> feature (VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) is there unconditionally defined to
> force the virtio framework to use the new map APIs.
>
> Patches 7 and 8 are new devicetree bindings, the first for spi-virtio
> (modelled against the existing ones for gpio-virtio and i2c-virtio) and
> the second for declaring virtio device inside a devicetree. This is not
> required for some devices (e.g.: can, net, gpu), but for others is
> necessary to declare child devices and link them.
>
> Patch 9 is used to convince the remoteproc-virtio transport to parse the
> bindings just defined; it is worth noting that the virtio framework
> already has the support for devicetree declarations and this adds only
> the glue between the existing support and remoteproc.
>
> Patches 10 and 11 are i.MX-specific and enable the usage of the newly
> introduced support on this family of platforms. The first one might
> probably be sumbitted as-is independently of the series, as it aligns
> the behavior of imx-rproc to the other platforms in relation to mailbox
> usage.
>
> Finally, patch 12 is the PoC that has been used to develop and test the
> series and shall not be merged.
>
> ======
>
> Thank you in advance for any comment you may want to leave.
>
> Regards,
> Francesco
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1330589497-4139-1-git-send-email-ohad@xxxxxxxxxx/
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2.5/source/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst#L26
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20260721204704.400781-1-shenwei.wang@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> [4] https://cfp.embedded-recipes.org/er2026/talk/PCYPJP/
> [5] https://github.com/WallaceIT/zephyr/tree/multi_vdev
> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260621-vring_flex-v1-1-c6c582fbe94b@xxxxxxxx/
>
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Valla <francesco@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Francesco Valla (12):
> remoteproc: virtio: cleanup rproc_add_virtio_dev error path
> remoteproc: virtio: replace commas with semicolons
> remoteproc: virtio: support dynamic number of vrings
> dma-coherent: add base and size APIs
> remoteproc: always report VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature
> remoteproc: virtio: add bounce buffering for data buffers
> dt-bindings: spi: add bindings for spi-virtio
> dt-bindings: remoteproc: add remoteproc-virtio
> remoteproc: search for a fwnode during vdev registration
> remoteproc: imx_rproc: always use non-blocking mailboxes
> dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx-rproc: support virtio
> PoC: arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-frdm: add multiple vdevs
>
> .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml | 3 +-
> .../bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-virtio.yaml | 89 +++++++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-virtio.yaml | 52 +++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-frdm.dts | 128 +++++++++++-
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 49 +----
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.h | 1 -
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 43 +++-
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/dma-map-ops.h | 10 +
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 24 ++-
> kernel/dma/coherent.c | 34 ++++
> 11 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 9b87fdc9af2fbfcdb5c24a64139685ef80f6573f
> change-id: 20260915-remoteproc_virtio_map-bcf32a5fab54
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Francesco Valla <francesco@xxxxxxxx>
>