Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] ipvs: avoid stack overflow from recursive connection expiration
From: Julian Anastasov
Date: Fri Sep 18 2026 - 13:38:48 EST
Hello,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2026, Zihan Xi wrote:
> When a controlled IPVS connection expires, its controller may be expired
> synchronously if it has no remaining controlled connections. A chain of
> controlled connections can then cause recursive calls to
> ip_vs_conn_expire() and exhaust the kernel stack during namespace cleanup.
>
> Make ip_vs_conn_del_put() report whether it deleted the controller timer.
> When it succeeds, continue expiration with the controller instead of
> calling ip_vs_conn_expire() recursively. This keeps chain cleanup
> synchronous while using one stack frame for the whole chain.
>
> Fixes: f9200a52eedf ("ipvs: avoid expiring many connections from timer")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Co-developed-by: Luxing Yin <root@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luxing Yin <root@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zihan Xi <zihanx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Patch looks good to me for the nf tree, thanks!
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Next time use "nf"/"nf-next" tag for the IPVS patches.
> ---
> changes in v2:
> - Use a repeat path for controller cleanup so expiration stays
> synchronous without recursive calls or extra timer ticks.
> - v1 Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1789110326.git.zihanx@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> index 6fa3e1dc534c3..c7b88ce1765dc 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> @@ -1331,17 +1331,18 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_del(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> }
>
> /* Try to delete connection while holding reference */
> -static void ip_vs_conn_del_put(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> +static bool ip_vs_conn_del_put(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> {
> if (timer_delete(&cp->timer)) {
> /* Drop cp->control chain too */
> if (cp->control)
> cp->timeout = 0;
> __ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
> - ip_vs_conn_expire(&cp->timer);
> - } else {
> - __ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
> + return true;
> }
> +
> + __ip_vs_conn_put(cp);
> + return false;
> }
>
> static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> @@ -1349,6 +1350,7 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> struct ip_vs_conn *cp = timer_container_of(cp, t, timer);
> struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = cp->ipvs;
>
> +repeat:
> /*
> * do I control anybody?
> */
> @@ -1358,6 +1360,7 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> /* Unlink conn if not referenced anymore */
> if (likely(ip_vs_conn_unlink(cp))) {
> struct ip_vs_conn *ct = cp->control;
> + bool next = false;
>
> /* delete the timer if it is activated by other users */
> timer_delete(&cp->timer);
> @@ -1372,7 +1375,7 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> (!(ct->flags & IP_VS_CONN_F_TEMPLATE) ||
> !(ct->state & IP_VS_CTPL_S_ASSURED))) {
> IP_VS_DBG(4, "drop controlling connection\n");
> - ip_vs_conn_del_put(ct);
> + next = ip_vs_conn_del_put(ct);
> } else if (has_ref) {
> __ip_vs_conn_put(ct);
> }
> @@ -1402,6 +1405,10 @@ static void ip_vs_conn_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> else
> call_rcu(&cp->rcu_head, ip_vs_conn_rcu_free);
> atomic_dec(&ipvs->conn_count);
> + if (next) {
> + cp = ct;
> + goto repeat;
> + }
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>