Re: [PATCH RFC v3 07/12] net: stmmac: dwmac-s32: Add SGMII support

From: Maxime Chevallier

Date: Sat Sep 19 2026 - 08:05:35 EST


Hi Jan,

On 9/19/26 08:54, Jan Petrous via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Wire the NXP S32G SerDes XPCS PCS into the dwmac-s32 glue layer so the
> MAC can run SGMII over a SerDes lane.
>
> Changes:
> - s32_gmac_write_phy_intf_select: replace the hard-coded RGMII selector
> with a switch on phy_interface so SGMII (0x01), RGMII, RMII and MII
> all programme the SoC control register correctly.
> - Add s32_gmac_pcs_init: obtain the phylink_pcs handle from the SerDes
> subsystem via s32g_serdes_pcs_create(), keyed by the standard
> pcs-handle property on the GMAC node pointing at the SerDes XPCS lane
> child. Propagates -EPROBE_DEFER if the SerDes driver has not probed
> yet. There is no matching exit hook: the device link created by
> s32g_serdes_pcs_create() covers the lifetime.
> - Add s32_gmac_select_pcs: return the stored PCS handle when the
> negotiated interface is SGMII.
> - Hook pcs_init and select_pcs into plat_stmmacenet_data.
>
> Note that installing a select_pcs callback suppresses the core's
> integrated_pcs fallback, because stmmac treats a NULL return from
> select_pcs as "no PCS" rather than "fall through". This matches what
> dwmac-rzn1 and dwmac-intel already do.
>
> Both negotiation modes are supported by the PCS. The board device
> trees added later in this series describe the MAC-side link as fixed,
> so they exercise the out-of-band path.
>
> The XPCS header guards its s32g_serdes_pcs_create() declaration with
> IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_PHY_S32G_SERDES) and provides a static-inline stub
> returning -ENODEV otherwise. IS_REACHABLE is false both when the SerDes
> driver is disabled and in the built-in-consumer / modular-provider case
> (DWMAC_S32=y with PHY_S32G_SERDES=m), so this driver links in all four
> combinations of the two symbols.
>
> Linking is not sufficient on its own, though. In the DWMAC_S32=y with
> PHY_S32G_SERDES=m case the stub makes s32_gmac_pcs_init() return
> -ENODEV, and stmmac treats a failing plat->pcs_init() as fatal, so a
> built-in MAC would refuse to probe on any device tree describing
> pcs-handle. Add a Kconfig dependency forbidding that combination
> rather than letting it build into a MAC that cannot probe.
>
> Tested on an S32G3-VNP-RDB3 board: GMAC0 links at 1G over SGMII and
> passes traffic, both in SerDes mode 1 (alongside two active PCIe root
> complexes) and in mode 3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Petrous (OSS) <jan.petrous@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig | 6 ++
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> index e3dd5adda5ac..1443ff4149b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> @@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ config DWMAC_S32
> tristate "NXP S32G/S32R GMAC support"
> default ARCH_S32
> depends on OF && (ARCH_S32 || COMPILE_TEST)
> + # SGMII needs the PCS from the SerDes driver. The header falls back
> + # to a stub returning -ENODEV when that driver is not reachable, and
> + # stmmac makes a failing plat->pcs_init() fatal, so a built-in MAC
> + # with a modular SerDes would refuse to probe on any DT describing
> + # pcs-handle. Forbid that combination instead.
> + depends on PHY_S32G_SERDES || PHY_S32G_SERDES=n

select PHY_S32G_SERDES ? This is what other glues that require PCS do,
or there's a catch that prevents using it ?

> help
> Support for ethernet controller on NXP S32CC SOCs.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c
> index 024d8e10e918..a3a56b21181a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-s32.c
> @@ -16,12 +16,14 @@
> #include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/nxp-s32g-serdes.h>
> #include <linux/phylink.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/stmmac.h>
>
> #include "stmmac_platform.h"
> +#include "stmmac.h"
>
> #define GMAC_INTF_RATE_125M 125000000 /* 125MHz */
>
> @@ -40,23 +42,89 @@ struct s32_priv_data {
> phy_interface_t *intf_mode;
> struct clk *tx_clk;
> struct clk *rx_clk;
> + /* SGMII PCS provided by the SerDes subsystem (NULL if not SGMII) */
> + struct phylink_pcs *pcs;

There's already a phylink_pcs pointer in priv->hw, you shouldn't have to
store your own here.

> };
>
> static int s32_gmac_write_phy_intf_select(struct s32_priv_data *gmac)
> {
> + u32 intf_sel;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + switch (*gmac->intf_mode) {
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
> + intf_sel = S32_PHY_INTF_SEL_SGMII;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
> + intf_sel = S32_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
> + intf_sel = S32_PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII;
> + break;
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
> + intf_sel = S32_PHY_INTF_SEL_MII;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(gmac->dev, "Unsupported phy interface mode: %s\n",
> + phy_modes(*gmac->intf_mode));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }

We go from supporting RGMII only to RGMII + RMII + MII + SGMII.

Are RMII and MII actually supported on that platform ? if so, can you split
that into 2 commits : one for proper inft_sel support with RMII + MII added,
the another one for SGMII ?

> +
> if (gmac->ctrl_sts)
> - writel(S32_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII, gmac->ctrl_sts);
> + writel(intf_sel, gmac->ctrl_sts);
> else
> ret = regmap_write(gmac->sts_regmap, gmac->sts_offset,
> - S32_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII);
> + intf_sel);
>
> dev_dbg(gmac->dev, "PHY mode set to %s\n", phy_modes(*gmac->intf_mode));
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int s32_gmac_pcs_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct s32_priv_data *gmac = priv->plat->bsp_priv;
> + struct device_node *pcs_node;
> +
> + /*
> + * pcs-handle points at the SerDes XPCS lane child node; its
> + * nxp,xpcs-instance property is what identifies the XPCS instance.
> + */
> + pcs_node = of_parse_phandle(gmac->dev->of_node, "pcs-handle", 0);
> + if (!pcs_node) {
> + dev_dbg(gmac->dev, "no 'pcs-handle' property, SGMII PCS unavailable\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + gmac->pcs = s32g_serdes_pcs_create(gmac->dev, pcs_node);
> + of_node_put(pcs_node);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(gmac->pcs)) {
> + int err = PTR_ERR(gmac->pcs);
> +
> + gmac->pcs = NULL;
> + /* SerDes may not be probed yet - defer probe. */
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(gmac->dev, "SGMII PCS created via SerDes XPCS\n");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct phylink_pcs *s32_gmac_select_pcs(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> + phy_interface_t interface)
> +{
> + struct s32_priv_data *gmac = priv->plat->bsp_priv;
> +
> + if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII && gmac->pcs)
> + return gmac->pcs;

No need for the && gmac->pcs here, if it's NULL we return NULL anyway so you
can return priv->hw->phylink_pcs

> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static int s32_gmac_init(struct device *dev, void *priv)
> {
> struct s32_priv_data *gmac = priv;
> @@ -204,6 +272,8 @@ static int s32_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> plat->init = s32_gmac_init;
> plat->exit = s32_gmac_exit;
> + plat->pcs_init = s32_gmac_pcs_init;
> + plat->select_pcs = s32_gmac_select_pcs;
>
> plat->clk_tx_i = gmac->tx_clk;
> plat->set_clk_tx_rate = stmmac_set_clk_tx_rate;
>

Thanks,

Maxime