Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[Chris Li]

On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 6:16 AM Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2026-09-19 at 01:55 -0500, Chris Li wrote:
> >
> > We don't have to address all issues in one series. I actually advise
> > against lump too many patches into one series.
> >
> There are two things here.
>
> I totally agree that we can merge things piecemeal,
> and not aim for perfection at the start.

Agree.

> However, I believe we do need to take care that
> whatever design we go with is actually able to
> support the end user functionality we want.

Agree. I want to add that we should support new functionality without
sacrificing existing user functionality.

> We have to make sure that the path we pick does
> allow us to very easily add the user visible
> functionality that people need.

Agree.

> We can always swap out technical details behind
> the scenes later, but user interfaces are supposed
> to be stable.

I think we agree on all aspects.

Chris