Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] module: add SCMI device table alias support

From: Sudeep Holla

Date: Sun Sep 20 2026 - 03:36:32 EST


On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 10:39:46PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:09:36PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > On 18-Sep-26 15:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/device-id/scmi.h b/include/linux/device-id/scmi.h
> > >> new file mode 100644
> > >> index 000000000000..1b4ccfa9dcc5
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/include/linux/device-id/scmi.h
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> > >> +#ifndef LINUX_DEVICE_ID_SCMI_H
> > >> +#define LINUX_DEVICE_ID_SCMI_H
> > >> +
> > >> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> > >> +#endif
> > >> +
> > >> +#define SCMI_NAME_SIZE 32
> > >> +#define SCMI_MODULE_PREFIX "scmi:"
> > >> +
> > >> +struct scmi_device_id {
> > >> + __u8 protocol_id;
> > >> + char name[SCMI_NAME_SIZE];
> > >> +};
> > >> +
> > >> +#endif /* ifndef LINUX_DEVICE_ID_SCMI_H */
> > >
> > > You need to include this above file in include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > > to avoid duplication of its inclusion elsewhere. That's the pattern followed
> > > I see.
> >
> > That is what I did for v3, but Uwe, who is leading the splitting
> > of mod_devicetable.h from one large monster include to smaller
> > per subsystem/bus includes explicitly requested me to follow this
> > pattern, see:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/arm-scmi/aow2GFAfy84k-N2B@monoceros/
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >> diff --git a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c
> > >> index b4178c42d08f..91ec3704ee2b 100644
> > >> --- a/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c
> > >> +++ b/scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c
> > >> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> > >> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > >> #define COMPILE_OFFSETS
> > >> +#include <linux/device-id/scmi.h>
> > >
> > > Drop this for above mentioned reason.
> >
> > This was explictly added at request of Uwe because the goal is to
> > get rid of mod_devicetable.h including all the device-id headers
> > in a big single catch-all include. This is done because currently
> > many files include mod_devicetable.h and then if any of the device-id
> > headers changes everything needs to be rebuild, making incremental
> > kernel builds much slower.
> >
> > (and the same for the second include you point out)
>
> FTR: That all sounds right.
>
> Let's not add the the dependency mess that is mod_devicetable.h.
>

I am confused. I am asking to align with what's done in
Commit ad428f5811bd ("mod_devicetable.h: Split into per subsystem headers")
and you are disagreeing with that ?

I am not comfortable taking this patch unless there are other similar
examples that are agreed upon to break the pattern followed in the above
mentioned commit.

Uwe, please suggest.

--
Regards,
Sudeep