Re: [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: add support for module-owned work

[Cen Zhang]

Hi Tejun,

Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2026年9月22日周二 00:16写道：
>
> Please provide justification on why this needs to be done this way when
> everyone else can flush delayed items before unloading.
>

Thank you for the review, and sorry for the extra noise.

I will revisit whether the 6LoWPAN unload path can use the existing workqueue
flush/cancellation primitives while preserving the required module lifetime,
rather than adding a new workqueue API.

Thanks again for your patience.

Best regards,
Cen Zhang