Re: [PATCH net] net: don't require the hwtstamp NDOs when a PHY provides timestamping

[Nicolai Buchwitz]

On 22.9.2026 01:37, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:23:37 +0200 Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:

> [...]

> > No, IMHO not here. It would change change behaviour that never worked.
> > Thus I would suggest fixing this with a follow-up to net-next.
>
> Not sure I agree that it's separate but whatever, I don't want the 
> ioctl
> fix to miss rc5.
>
> I'd prefer the netlink fix to also target net, tho. Netlink
> functionality should match the IOCTL, targeting -next would put user
> space in an awkward position when deciding between the two.

Ack, see 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260922070813.1458713-1-nb@xxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks
Nicolai