Re: [BUG] ocfs2: assertion failure in _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits on a crafted image
From: Joseph Qi
Date: Tue Sep 22 2026 - 05:29:48 EST
Out-of-date ocfs2-devel maillist, resend to ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Joseph
On 9/22/26 1:55 PM, CJ wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am reporting an issue triggered by a syzkaller reproducer on Linux
> 7.3.0-rc2. The issue is reproducible with HEAD commit
> df2908090cda368b01ff43709f51890076c56157.
>
>
> The reproducer mounts a crafted ocfs2 image with commit= options and then
> removes a directory, which makes ocfs2 evict the inode and release its
> suballocator bits.
>
>
> While freeing the bits, _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits() reads the group
> descriptor for the target group and checks that the range it is about to
> clear fits within the group's declared bit count. The check fails and
> BUG_ON() terminates the kernel. The call path is ocfs2_evict_inode() ->
> ocfs2_wipe_inode() -> ocfs2_remove_inode() -> ocfs2_free_dinode() ->
> _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits(), reached from vfs_rmdir() in the unlinkat
> syscall context.
>
>
> This looks like the on-disk group descriptor and the suballocator chain
> disagreeing about the size of the group, so the release range computed from
> the chain falls outside it. Since the image is untrusted input, reporting
> the inconsistency as a filesystem error instead of an assertion would keep
> the kernel alive. I have not determined which of the two metadata sources
> carries the inconsistent value.
>
>
> This failure was reported earlier against the linux-6.1 longterm series at
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3b664d98a77a329be77e, and the
> reproducer below is the one from that report. It still reproduces on the
> tested mainline kernel.
>
>
> Reproducer:
>
>
> syz reproducer: https://pastebin.com/raw/9vVANXgZ
> console output: https://pastebin.com/raw/AZMvqBm0
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=KernelConfig&x=6a5cbd268406bf43
>
>
> Kernel:
>
>
> HEAD commit: df2908090cda368b01ff43709f51890076c56157
> git tree: mainline
> kernel version: 7.3.0-rc2
> tested tag: v7.3-rc2 (annotated tag object 5e036ce12de91c6fd674dad33b169c6150be2a7a)
>
>
> Let me know if you need more details or testing.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Changjian Liu