Re: [PATCH 0/2] memblock tests: fix BUILD=32 address conversions

[Mike Rapoport]

> Fix two BUILD=32 failures: truncating a physical address before freeing
> it, and sign-extending simulated memory addresses. Existing assertions
> cover both regressions.
> 
> The runner passes with GCC in both allocation directions across 32-bit
> builds, 32-bit phys_addr_t, and NUMA configurations. BUILD=32 NUMA=1 also
> passes with Clang.

Does it mean BUILD=32 without NUMA does not pass with clang?

I see a lot of warnings with gcc and BUILD=32. Do you mind fixing them
as well?

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.