Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[Chris Li]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 5:07 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 04:56:48AM -1000, Chris Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:43 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > People can speak for themselves and suggest other time slots. You do not speak
> > > for anyone but yourself here. At this point this is derailing the conversation.
> > >
> >
> > I am expressing my opinion, freedom of speech. As you can see in the
> > previous discussion, Baoquan wasn't able to join that time slot. He is
> > a major shareholder in XSwap. I worry that alignment vswap vs xswap
> > without Baoquan is ineffective. That is my opinion.
>
> Actually, he said he is not sure if he can make it, and before Nhat
> could respond to that soft push you drew a hard line without actually
> proposing a workable alternative that made Nhat give up instead.

Please consider that it is 1AM in Beijing if I remember correctly. I
don't consider that is a workable and reasonable ask.

> So my free speech opinion is the same as Shakeel's: you're speaking
> for others and thereby derailing efforts to align on something.

I sympathize with asking Baoquan to join a meeting at midnight.

>
> We all want Baoquan in the room.

In Chinese we have this saying: don't apply things to others that you
wouldn't want applied to yourself. Do you want to participate in a
technical meeting at 1 AM?

Chris