Re: [PATCH v18] arm64: mm: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs)

From: Suzuki K Poulose

Date: Tue Sep 22 2026 - 11:44:02 EST


On 22/09/2026 15:49, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 02:21:13PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
I had another look and we could handle this via kvm_fault_is_gmem_abort()
see in arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c:


diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 87e49251e0447..af5a4bf961aae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1731,6 +1731,9 @@ static int gmem_abort(const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc
*s2fd)
gfn_t gfn;
int ret;

+ if (!kvm_slot_has_gmem(s2fd->memslot))
+ return -EINVAL;

I wonder whether we should add a KVM_BUG_ON() here. With the rest of the
changes, we should never get in this situation. Well, to be revisited
for private devices.

Sure, I could add that


Also maybe move it to the caller, kvm_vm_mem_abort(), and not change
kvm_fault_is_gmem_abort(). Something like:

if (private_ipa_fault(kvm, s2fd->fault_ipa) &&
KVM_BUG_ON(!kvm_slot_has_gmem(s2fd->memslot), kvm))
return -EIO;

To me it makes more sense for gmem_abort() to be called only *if* it's a
gmem slot. So any inconsistency, avoiding user_mem_abort() for private
memory, should be done in the caller. I assume the caller will also have
to route the private device path as well rather than rely on
gmem_abort().

Agree.


+
if (!perm_fault) {
memcache = get_mmu_memcache(vcpu);
ret = topup_mmu_memcache(vcpu, memcache);
@@ -2277,10 +2280,12 @@ static bool private_ipa_fault(struct kvm *kvm,
phys_addr_t fault_ipa);
static bool kvm_fault_is_gmem_abort(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_s2_fault_desc *s2fd)
{
- if (!kvm_slot_has_gmem(s2fd->memslot))
- return false;
if (kvm_memslot_is_gmem_only(s2fd->memslot))
return true;
+ /*
+ * For Realms, all private faults must be backed by GMEM.
+ * TODO: Handle Trusted device private memory mappings.
+ */
if (private_ipa_fault(kvm, s2fd->fault_ipa))
return true;
return false;


Also, I have the following hunk for preventing memslot modifications.
I will add this to v20 integration branch, which is almost ready ;-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 582b48e34486b..87e49251e0447 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2783,6 +2783,18 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
}
}

+static bool kvm_prevents_memslot_change(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_mr_change change)
+{
+ /* Cannot modify memslots once a pVM has run or Realm created */
+ if (change != KVM_MR_DELETE && change != KVM_MR_MOVE)
+ return false;
+
+ if ((kvm_vm_is_protected_pkvm(kvm) && pkvm_hyp_vm_is_created(kvm)) ||
+ kvm_realm_is_created(kvm))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *old,
struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
@@ -2791,12 +2803,9 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
hva_t hva, reg_end;
int ret = 0;

- if (kvm_vm_is_protected_pkvm(kvm)) {
- /* Cannot modify memslots once a pVM has run. */
- if (pkvm_hyp_vm_is_created(kvm) &&
- (change == KVM_MR_DELETE || change == KVM_MR_MOVE)) {
+ if (kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm)) {
+ if (kvm_prevents_memslot_change(kvm, change))
return -EPERM;
- }

if (new &&
new->flags & (KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES | KVM_MEM_READONLY)) {

I think this should work.

Cheers
Suzuki


Thanks.