Re: [PATCH] netfs: Fix missing alloc tagging of direct mempool allocations

From: Suren Baghdasaryan

Date: Tue Sep 22 2026 - 23:08:49 EST


On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 7:37 PM Hao Ge <hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in writeback by
> adding a mempool") added a mempool for the folio_queues and made the
> request, subrequest and folio_queue allocations distinguish between
> writeback and everything else. Writeback is part of memory reclaim
> and must not fail due to ENOMEM, so it allocates under GFP_NOFS
> through mempool_alloc(), which may dip into the pool's reserve and,
> if that runs empty, wait for elements to be returned. The
> GFP_KERNEL paths, which can return -ENOMEM to their callers, invoke
> the pool's ->alloc() callback directly instead.
>
> The direct call, however, skips the alloc_hooks() wrapper that the
> mempool_alloc() macro provides. The pool callbacks, mempool_alloc_slab()
> and mempool_kmalloc(), call kmem_cache_alloc_noprof() and kmalloc_noprof()
> and rely on current->alloc_tag having been set by the caller. With
> CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y this leads to
>
> current->alloc_tag not set
> WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161 at __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook
> alloc_tag was not set
> WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:166 at __alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook
>
> at allocation and free time respectively, as reported when reading
> files on a CIFS mount. The allocations are also missing from
> /proc/allocinfo.
>
> Wrap the direct ->alloc() invocations in alloc_hooks() with the new
> netfs_mempool_alloc_noreserve() helper. The GFP_KERNEL paths keep their
> failable allocation semantics, they just get tagged now.
>
> Fixes: 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in writeback by adding a mempool")
> Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b004319-9ef7-437c-a4dd-174d6a9a83db@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> Tested-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <hao.ge@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/netfs/internal.h | 3 +++
> fs/netfs/objects.c | 4 ++--
> fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/internal.h b/fs/netfs/internal.h
> index c79c8e69d60c..08ba7f0ebff0 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/netfs/internal.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ extern mempool_t netfs_request_pool;
> extern mempool_t netfs_subrequest_pool;
> extern mempool_t netfs_folioq_pool;
>
> +#define netfs_mempool_alloc_noreserve(_pool, _gfp) \
> + alloc_hooks((_pool)->alloc(_gfp, (_pool)->pool_data))

I think this macro should reside in include/linux/mempool.h and not be
netfs-specific. Something like:

#define mempool_alloc_noreserve(_pool, _gfp) \
alloc_hooks((_pool)->alloc(_gfp, (_pool)->pool_data))

> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> static inline void netfs_proc_add_rreq(struct netfs_io_request *rreq)
> {
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c
> index 7f6a3e912602..0b509c93d4af 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct address_space *mapping,
>
> rreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, gfp);
> } else {
> - rreq = mempool->alloc(gfp, mempool->pool_data);
> + rreq = netfs_mempool_alloc_noreserve(mempool, gfp);
> if (!rreq)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct netfs_io_subrequest *netfs_alloc_subrequest(struct netfs_io_request *rreq
> struct kmem_cache *cache = mempool->pool_data;
>
> if (rreq->gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
> - subreq = mempool->alloc(rreq->gfp, mempool->pool_data);
> + subreq = netfs_mempool_alloc_noreserve(mempool, rreq->gfp);
> else
> subreq = mempool_alloc(mempool, rreq->gfp);
> if (!subreq)
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
> index 424e77a9a109..54867ceaa205 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/rolling_buffer.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct folio_queue *netfs_folioq_alloc(unsigned int rreq_id, gfp_t gfp,
> struct folio_queue *fq;
>
> if (gfp == GFP_KERNEL)
> - fq = netfs_folioq_pool.alloc(gfp, netfs_folioq_pool.pool_data);
> + fq = netfs_mempool_alloc_noreserve(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp);
> else
> fq = mempool_alloc(&netfs_folioq_pool, gfp);
> if (fq) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>