Re: [PATCH v2] audit: fix exe mark UAF in kill_rules()
From: Ricardo Robaina
Date: Wed Sep 23 2026 - 08:02:10 EST
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 5:34 PM Jérémy Jean
<Jeremy.Jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> kill_rules() removes mixed AUDIT_DIR and AUDIT_EXE rules when an audit
> tree is pruned. It drops entry->rule.exe before removing the rule from
> the RCU-visible filter lists.
>
> After a rule has been installed with AUDIT_ADD_RULE, which requires
> CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL, removing the watched directory can race with another
> task that is still evaluating the rule. In that case, fsnotify can free
> the executable mark before the reader reaches audit_mark_compare(),
> causing a use-after-free.
>
> KASAN reports:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in audit_mark_compare+0x8d/0xa0
>
> Unlink the published rules from the RCU-visible lists and retain them
> on tree->rules for cleanup. If any rule has an executable mark, wait for
> a single RCU grace period before removing the marks and scheduling the
> entries for freeing. Otherwise, call_rcu() already provides the required
> deferred freeing without a synchronous wait.
>
> Fixes: 34d99af52ad4 ("audit: implement audit by executable")
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
> Signed-off-by: Jérémy Jean <Jeremy.Jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me. I've checked that audit-testsuite passes cleanly.
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@xxxxxxxxxx>
# uname -r
7.3.0-rc4+
# make test
make -C tests test
Running as user root
with context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
on system Fedora
amcast_joinpart/test ................. ok
backlog_wait_time_actual_reset/test .. ok
bpf/test ............................. ok
coredump/test ........................ ok
exec_execve/test ..................... ok
exec_name/test ....................... ok
fanotify/test ........................ ok
field_compare/test ................... ok
file_create/test ..................... ok
file_delete/test ..................... ok
file_permission/test ................. ok
file_rename/test ..................... ok
filter_device/test ................... ok
filter_exclude/test .................. ok
filter_exit/test ..................... ok
filter_inode/test .................... ok
filter_saddr_fam/test ................ ok
filter_sessionid/test ................ ok
io_uring/test ........................ ok
login_tty/test ....................... ok
lost_reset/test ...................... ok
netfilter_pkt/test ................... ok
signal/test .......................... ok
syscalls_file/test ................... ok
syscall_module/test .................. ok
syscall_socketcall/test .............. ok
time_change/test ..................... ok
user_msg/test ........................ ok
All tests successful.
Files=28, Tests=303, 69 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.03 sys + 36.64
cusr 1.87 csys = 38.62 CPU)
Result: PASS
> ---
>
> v2: Address Sashiko's review with Ricardo Robaina's improved patch:
> - Batch executable-mark teardown behind one synchronize_rcu() after
> unlinking all rules, instead of waiting once per rule under the audit
> mutexes.
> - Skip the synchronous wait when none of the removed rules has an
> executable mark.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260921195921.4174830-2-Jeremy.Jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> kernel/audit_tree.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index 1ed19b775912..f2e81be8265e 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -545,22 +545,38 @@ static void kill_rules(struct audit_context *context, struct audit_tree *tree)
> {
> struct audit_krule *rule, *next;
> struct audit_entry *entry;
> + bool need_sync = false;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, next, &tree->rules, rlist) {
> entry = container_of(rule, struct audit_entry, rule);
>
> - list_del_init(&rule->rlist);
> if (rule->tree) {
> /* not a half-baked one */
> audit_tree_log_remove_rule(context, rule);
> - if (entry->rule.exe)
> - audit_remove_mark(entry->rule.exe);
> rule->tree = NULL;
> list_del_rcu(&entry->list);
> list_del(&entry->rule.list);
> - call_rcu(&entry->rcu, audit_free_rule_rcu);
> + if (entry->rule.exe)
> + need_sync = true;
> + } else {
> + list_del_init(&rule->rlist);
> }
> }
> +
> + if (list_empty(&tree->rules))
> + return;
> +
> + if (need_sync)
> + synchronize_rcu();
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, next, &tree->rules, rlist) {
> + entry = container_of(rule, struct audit_entry, rule);
> +
> + list_del_init(&rule->rlist);
> + if (entry->rule.exe)
> + audit_remove_mark(entry->rule.exe);
> + call_rcu(&entry->rcu, audit_free_rule_rcu);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
>
--Ricardo