Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] mm: distinguish PTE table storage from PTE values

[Alexander Gordeev]

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:

Hi Muhammad,

> I've the patches here [3] for arm64 conversion which I used to find
> usages in generic code which I missed during development. These would be
> sent separately.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6110202c-057b-4701-8c04-1a76ee7bb9ab@xxxxxxx/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/a063f6c5-2785-4a9f-8079-25edb3e54cef@xxxxxxx
> [3] https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-us/-/commits/pte0_arm

I checked [3] with s390 and also against our lazy mmu implementation and it
looks okay.

However, is there a particular reason this series is against mm-new?
Should it be against the master, it would be easier for me to try it in our CI.

> Thanks,
> Usama

Thanks!