Re: [PATCH 01/10] selftests/mm: exercise MADV_COLD and MADV_PAGEOUT
From: Gregory Price
Date: Wed Sep 23 2026 - 10:53:19 EST
On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 03:26:05PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
>
> I think in general we want to avoid putting stress tests as part of the
> selftests in general? Or at least if they might take a long time to run or
> excessive memory usage, etc.
>
> Though that might be benchmarks, as we have the THP stress tests so maybe it's
> OK?
>
> >
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Signed-off-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In any case I really do think this should be split out into smaller parts, this
> is a _gigantic_ change :)
>
Absolutely, but alas my poor email hosting throttles me if i send too
many emails - and sending a 38-part series where the important part is
the endpoint of the refactor moreso than the individual tests...
instant 24-hour timeout.
I'm working on a solution. Need better hosting.
> Since you list a whole bunch of different test areas and you're exercising
> different things you should be able to split this out logically across those I
> think?
As mentioned, this was originally ~28 patches split out, but i think
ultimately only the contractual tests should be shipped.
Maybe there's an argument for keeping some of the implementation
details - they're fairly easy to find in the code below for individual
inspection.
Examples
contractual: These tests won't change behavior based on implementation
- authorized file PAGEOUT evicts a clean file page;
- unauthorized shared-file PAGEOUT leaves the page resident; and
- private-file PAGEOUT reclaims a COW page but preserves a file page.
implementation detail: behavior can change without breaking a contract
- full and partial MADV_COLD on a PTE-mapped THP
~Gregory