Re: [PATCH] ACPI: use IS_ENABLED() to simplify built-in or module checks

[Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 9:40 PM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 22.09.26 um 18:43 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel):
>
> > +Armin
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 10:14 AM Lalit Shankar Chowdhury
> > <lalitshankarch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Replace the remaining built-in/module check for CONFIG_ACPI_WMI
> >> with IS_ENABLED() macro.
>
> Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@xxxxxx>

Applied as 7.4 material, thanks!

> >> Signed-off-by: Lalit Shankar Chowdhury <lalitshankarch@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   include/linux/acpi.h | 2 +-
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> >> index ddacac812094..b590f520dc57 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> >> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ extern acpi_handle ec_get_handle(void);
> >>
> >>   extern bool acpi_is_pnp_device(struct acpi_device *);
> >>
> >> -#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_WMI) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_WMI_MODULE)
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_WMI)
> >>
> >>   typedef void (*wmi_notify_handler) (union acpi_object *data, void *context);
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.53.0
> >>
> >>