Re: [PATCH] ata: libata-scsi: bound the ATA passthru sense descriptor writes
From: Niklas Cassel
Date: Wed Sep 23 2026 - 13:20:50 EST
On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 02:26:55AM +0800, Matthias Goergens wrote:
> When an ATA PASS-THROUGH command to an ATAPI device fails, the sense
> buffer holds the device's REQUEST SENSE reply, and
> ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields() trusts its additional length
> byte, sb[7], when adding the ATA Status Return descriptor. A faulty
> or malicious device can use that to make the kernel read and write
> past the 96-byte buffer in three ways:
>
> - scsi_sense_desc_find() is passed sb[7] + 8 as the buffer length, so
> its clamp against sb[7] does nothing and the walk runs off the end.
> - A type-9 descriptor found near the end is filled in unchecked.
> - A new descriptor at sb[8 + len] needs len + 22 bytes, not len + 14,
> so len 75..82 writes up to 8 bytes past the end.
>
> Reproduced with KASAN under qemu, with the emulated ATAPI REQUEST SENSE
> reply patched:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in scsi_sense_desc_find+0x1a5/0x210
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ata_scsi_qc_complete+0x1a15/0x1a50
>
> Both are gone with this patch, and a valid descriptor is still filled
> in.
>
> Fixes: 97981926224a ("ata: libata-scsi: Do not overwrite valid sense data when CK_COND=1")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 7e22bbc38238..40e56ff52f09 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -261,12 +261,18 @@ static void ata_scsi_set_passthru_sense_fields(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
>
> /* descriptor format */
> len = sb[7];
> - desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find(sb, len + 8, 9);
> + desc = (char *)scsi_sense_desc_find(sb, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, 9);
> if (!desc) {
> - if (SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE < len + 14)
> + /*
> + * The descriptor is written at sb[8 + len] and is 14
> + * bytes long, so it needs len + 22 bytes of buffer.
> + */
> + if (len + 22 > SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE)
> return;
> sb[7] = len + 14;
> desc = sb + 8 + len;
> + } else if (desc + 14 > sb + SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE) {
desc + 14 can point past one-past-the-end before the comparison, which
strict C doesn't allow. The kernel builds with -fno-strict-overflow,
so in practice it's fine, but:
+ } else if (desc - sb > SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE - 14) {
should be equivalent and safer.
Kind regards,
Niklas