Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: socfpga: agilex: convert to CLK_OF_DECLARE()
From: Jerome Brunet
Date: Fri Sep 25 2026 - 05:34:20 EST
On lun. 21 sept. 2026 at 11:17, "Ng, Adrian Ho Yin" <adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 9/19/2026 6:42 AM, Brian Masney wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 03:01:18PM +0800, adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> From: Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Register Agilex and eASIC N5X clocks at of_clk_init() so they are
>>> available before platform devices probe.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex.c | 83 +++++++++++---------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex.c b/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex.c
>>> index 2bdea1997b5e..64a20c727d16 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/socfpga/clk-agilex.c
>>> @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@
>>> */
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>> -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/agilex-clock.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -454,24 +455,26 @@ static int n5x_clk_register_pll(const struct stratix10_pll_clock *clks,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int agilex_clkmgr_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +static void __init agilex_clkmgr_init(struct device_node *np)
>>> {
>>> - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> struct stratix10_clock_data *clk_data;
>>> void __iomem *base;
>>> int i, num_clks;
>>>
>>> - base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(base))
>>> - return PTR_ERR(base);
>>> + base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>> + if (!base) {
>>> + pr_err("%s: failed to map clock registers\n", __func__);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> num_clks = AGILEX_NUM_CLKS;
>>>
>>> - clk_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(clk_data, clk_data.hws,
>>> - num_clks), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (!clk_data)
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> + clk_data = kzalloc(struct_size(clk_data, clk_data.hws, num_clks),
>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!clk_data) {
>>> + iounmap(base);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> clk_data->clk_data.num = num_clks;
>>> clk_data->base = base;
>>> @@ -491,27 +494,28 @@ static int agilex_clkmgr_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> agilex_clk_register_gate(agilex_gate_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(agilex_gate_clks),
>>> clk_data);
>>> of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, &clk_data->clk_data);
>>> - return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int n5x_clkmgr_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +static void __init n5x_clkmgr_init(struct device_node *np)
>>> {
>>> - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> struct stratix10_clock_data *clk_data;
>>> void __iomem *base;
>>> int i, num_clks;
>>>
>>> - base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(base))
>>> - return PTR_ERR(base);
>>> + base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>>> + if (!base) {
>>> + pr_err("%s: failed to map clock registers\n", __func__);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> num_clks = AGILEX_NUM_CLKS;
>>>
>>> - clk_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(clk_data, clk_data.hws,
>>> - num_clks), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (!clk_data)
>>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>> + clk_data = kzalloc(struct_size(clk_data, clk_data.hws, num_clks),
>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!clk_data) {
>>> + iounmap(base);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> clk_data->base = base;
>>> clk_data->clk_data.num = num_clks;
>>> @@ -531,38 +535,7 @@ static int n5x_clkmgr_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> agilex_clk_register_gate(agilex_gate_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(agilex_gate_clks),
>>> clk_data);
>>> of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, &clk_data->clk_data);
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static int agilex_clkmgr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> -{
>>> - int (*probe_func)(struct platform_device *init_func);
>>> -
>>> - probe_func = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>>> - if (!probe_func)
>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>> - return probe_func(pdev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static const struct of_device_id agilex_clkmgr_match_table[] = {
>>> - { .compatible = "intel,agilex-clkmgr",
>>> - .data = agilex_clkmgr_init },
>>> - { .compatible = "intel,easic-n5x-clkmgr",
>>> - .data = n5x_clkmgr_init },
>>> - { }
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -static struct platform_driver agilex_clkmgr_driver = {
>>> - .probe = agilex_clkmgr_probe,
>>> - .driver = {
>>> - .name = "agilex-clkmgr",
>>> - .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>>> - .of_match_table = agilex_clkmgr_match_table,
>>> - },
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> -static int __init agilex_clk_init(void)
>>> -{
>>> - return platform_driver_register(&agilex_clkmgr_driver);
>>> -}
>>> -core_initcall(agilex_clk_init);
>>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(agilex_clkmgr, "intel,agilex-clkmgr", agilex_clkmgr_init);
>>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(n5x_clkmgr, "intel,easic-n5x-clkmgr", n5x_clkmgr_init);
>>
>> Why do all of these clk providers need to be registered so early?
>> CLK_OF_DECLARE is abused quite a bit today and the majority of the clk
>> drivers that use it don't actually need it.
>>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> subsys_initcall() / subsys_platform_driver() would not fix the failure
> we are hitting. Both still run after time_init(), while the DW APB timer
> is registered via TIMER_OF_DECLARE from timer_probe().
You presumably only need a tiny subset of clock to feed the timer, not
the whole controller
Can you just register those early ? clk_mt8173_infracfg* does that for example.
>
> So moving from core_initcall() to subsys_initcall() changes nothing for
> this consumer: the timer cannot defer, clk_get() still fails, and the
> timer is never brought up. That is why these patches use
> CLK_OF_DECLARE(): the provider must be registered from of_clk_init() so
> clocks exist before TIMER_OF_DECLARE runs.
>
> On the broader point about CLK_OF_DECLARE abuse: I agree it should not
> be used merely to beat platform device probe. If the preferred approach
> is to keep the clkmgr as a platform driver (subsys_platform_driver())
> and give the DW APB timer nodes a fixed clock-frequency instead of a
> clocks phandle, I can respin that way. Please let me know which you prefer.
>
> Thank You
> Adrian
>> core_initcall() is pretty early as well. Can you use subsys_initcall
>> instead so that it's available by time the platform devices probe?
>>
>> I recently introduced a subsys_platform_driver() macro to simplify the
>> code that should do what you need.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20260908-subsys_initcall-v1-0-cbccf4cd4288@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Brian
>
--
Jerome