Re: [RFC PATCH 0/12] drm/fabric: vendor-neutral topology infrastructure for scale-up accelerator interconnects

[Rodrigo Vivi]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 01:19:11PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 11:09:28 +0300 Konstantin Sinyuk wrote:
> >   2. Are the Generic Netlink semantics, including dump consistency,
> >      notifications and optional port statistics, aligned with YNL
> >      expectations?
> 
> > 39 files changed, 13189 insertions(+)
> 
> Networking is absolutely flooded with AI generated patches.
> Including long term contributors excreting huge unreviewed
> code dumps :/ We have absolutely no time to help other subsystems.
> Please do not use Netlink going forward, sorry.

Hi Jakub,

I do understand the feeling here :(

But I do hope that you reconsider your position here. We had such a great
experience with the drm-ras using the netlink and I was really hoping that
we could just reproduce the same experience here.

Netlink is such an incredible API.

Would it help if I take the maintainership of this drm-fabric netlink
along with the drm-ras one, ensuring the same consistent and clean usage?

Thanks,
Rodrigo.