Re: [PATCH 0/2] MIPS: fix typos and repeated words in comments

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 06:19:18PM +0530, Hemanth Selam wrote:
> This corrects 2 misspellings and repeated words in comments.  Each is a
> separate patch so that any one of them can be dropped without touching
> the rest.
> 
> Nothing outside comments changes.  Every touched C file was checked by
> dropping its comments, replacing each string literal with a placeholder
> and collapsing whitespace; what remained was identical before and after,
> so the compiled code cannot differ.
> 
> The mistakes were found with scripts/checkpatch.pl against the list in
> scripts/spelling.txt.  The scanning, the edits and the changelogs were
> produced with Cursor running the claude-opus-5 model, from a request to
> find and fix spelling mistakes across the tree, and every correction was
> then re-checked by the comparison described above.  Words that name an
> identifier were left alone deliberately, even when they read as typos,
> because correcting the prose would make the comment disagree with the
> code it describes.
> 
> Tested by building x86_64 defconfig at v7.3-rc1-269-gbc35965f6940, which
> is clean.  Nothing else was built, so any patch touching code that
> x86_64 defconfig does not compile has been read but not compiled.
> 
> Hemanth Selam (2):
>   MIPS: fix typos in comments
>   MIPS: fix repeated words in comments
> 
>  arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-memcpy.S            | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/boot_param.h | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/lib/memcpy.S                             | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/n64/init.c                               | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

series applied to mips-next

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]