Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Require clocks for Exynos9610 pinctrl nodes

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 07:14:55PM +0300, Alexandru Chimac wrote:
> Hello!
> > On 09/23/2026 5:58 PM EEST Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > On 22/09/2026 14:15, Alexandru Chimac wrote:
> > > All Exynos9610 pin controllers (except PINCTRL_TOP) have clocks assigned
> > > to them, so force the nodes to have clocks assigned to them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Chimac <alex@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Most Samsung Exynos9610 pin controllers (except TOP) have clocks
> > > designated for them, so allow the device tree node to include clock
> > 
> > I don't understand above. It's contradictory to commit msg which says
> > ALL. Here you say most.
> > 
> 
> On Exynos9610, only TOP pinctrl doesn't have a clock (as far as I'm
> aware; haven't found a clock for it), while the rest of the pin controller
> blocks do.

So how is it supposed to work if you require clock also for TOP pinctrl?

Best regards,
Krzysztof