Re: [PATCH v10 12/19] drivers: soc: ti: k3-ringacc: handle absence of tisci

[Vignesh Raghavendra]

> Handle absence of tisci with direct register writes. This will support
> platforms that do not have tisci firmware like AM62L.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sai Sree Kartheek Adivi <s-adivi@xxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c
> index 5966db4327b1..15fab94e8cad 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-ringacc.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -46,6 +47,53 @@ struct k3_ring_rt_regs {
>  	u32	hwindx;
>  };
>  
> +#define K3_RINGACC_RT_CFG_REGS_OFS	0x40
> +#define K3_DMARING_CFG_ADDR_HI_MASK	GENMASK(3, 0)
> +#define K3_DMARING_CFG_ASEL_SHIFT	16
> +#define K3_DMARING_CFG_SIZE_MASK	GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_ring_cfg_regs - The RA Configuration Registers region
> + *
> + * @ba_lo: Ring Base Address Low Register
> + * @ba_hi: Ring Base Address High Register
> + * @size: Ring Size Register
> + */
> +struct k3_ring_cfg_regs {
> +	u32	ba_lo;
> +	u32	ba_hi;
> +	u32	size;
> +};
> +
> +#define K3_RINGACC_RT_INT_REGS_OFS		0x140
> +#define K3_RINGACC_RT_INT_ENABLE_SET_COMPLETE	BIT(0)
> +#define K3_RINGACC_RT_INT_ENABLE_SET_TR			BIT(2)
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_ring_intr_regs {
> + *
> + * @enable_set: Ring Interrupt Enable Register
> + * @resv_1: Reserved
> + * @clr: Ring Interrupt Clear Register
> + * @resv_2: Reserved
> + * @status_set: Ring Interrupt Status Set Register
> + * @resv_3: Reserved
> + * @status: Ring Interrupt Status Register
> + * @resv_4: Reserved
> + * @status_masked: Ring Interrupt Status Masked Register
> + */
> +struct k3_ring_intr_regs {
> +	u32	enable_set;
> +	u32	resv_1;
> +	u32	clr;
> +	u32	resv_2;
> +	u32	status_set;
> +	u32	resv_3;
> +	u32	status;
> +	u32	resv_4;
> +	u32	status_masked;
> +};
> +
>  #define K3_RINGACC_RT_REGS_STEP			0x1000
>  #define K3_DMARING_RT_REGS_STEP			0x2000
>  #define K3_DMARING_RT_REGS_REVERSE_OFS		0x1000
> @@ -139,6 +187,8 @@ struct k3_ring_state {
>   * struct k3_ring - RA Ring descriptor
>   *
>   * @rt: Ring control/status registers
> + * @cfg: Ring config registers
> + * @intr: Ring interrupt registers
>   * @fifos: Ring queues registers
>   * @proxy: Ring Proxy Datapath registers
>   * @ring_mem_dma: Ring buffer dma address
> @@ -158,6 +208,8 @@ struct k3_ring_state {
>   */
>  struct k3_ring {
>  	struct k3_ring_rt_regs __iomem *rt;
> +	struct k3_ring_cfg_regs __iomem *cfg;
> +	struct k3_ring_intr_regs __iomem *intr;
>  	struct k3_ring_fifo_regs __iomem *fifos;
>  	struct k3_ringacc_proxy_target_regs  __iomem *proxy;
>  	dma_addr_t	ring_mem_dma;
> @@ -467,15 +519,37 @@ static void k3_ringacc_ring_reset_sci(struct k3_ring *ring)
>  	struct k3_ringacc *ringacc = ring->parent;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ring_cfg.nav_id = ringacc->tisci_dev_id;
> -	ring_cfg.index = ring->ring_id;
> -	ring_cfg.valid_params = TI_SCI_MSG_VALUE_RM_RING_COUNT_VALID;
> -	ring_cfg.count = ring->size;
> +	if (!ringacc->tisci) {
> +		u32 reg;
>  
> -	ret = ringacc->tisci_ring_ops->set_cfg(ringacc->tisci, &ring_cfg);
> -	if (ret)
> -		dev_err(ringacc->dev, "TISCI reset ring fail (%d) ring_idx %d\n",
> -			ret, ring->ring_id);
> +		if (!ring->cfg)
> +			return;
> +
> +		reg = readl(&ring->cfg->size);
> +		reg &= ~K3_DMARING_CFG_SIZE_MASK;
> +		writel(reg, &ring->cfg->size);
> +
> +		ret = readl_poll_timeout(&ring->cfg->size, reg,
> +					  !(reg & K3_DMARING_CFG_SIZE_MASK),
> +					  1, 100);
> +		if (ret)
> +			dev_err(ringacc->dev, "ring %d size clear timeout\n",
> +				ring->ring_id);
> +

Should we error out instead of continue to set the size below?

-- 
Vignesh