Re: [PATCH RFC] gpio: move intel drivers into their own directory

[Mika Westerberg]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 02:34:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 12:07:27 +0200, Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 05:34:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 02:54:33PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > >> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 01:48:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 12:22:15PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > >> > > >  drivers/gpio/{ => intel}/gpio-graniterapids.c   |  0
> > >> > > >  drivers/gpio/{ => intel}/gpio-novalake-events.c |  0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > These are interesting drivers, not sure where to put them
> > >> >
> > >> > IMHO they should be there too. We are maintaining them both.
> > >>
> > >> Do you send PRs to Bart or you just rely on him to take the patches?
> > >
> > > I don't expect these two drives to get too much attention, and they could
> > > be contained nicely inside intel folder and that would help Bart to
> > > identify that these are Intel drivers. So your bandwidth would not suffer
> > > even if these two are added there. Your call.
> >
> > I'd like to avoid a situation where we have Andy's Intel drivers under
> > drivers/gpio/intel/ and other Intel drivers under drivers/gpio/. I'd prefer
> > to move all of intel GPIO drivers into drivers/gpio/intel/ and have Andy
> > gather changes to them if he agrees.
> 
> Okay, we have two parts missing:
> - Nova Lake driver (I would need Adam or Mika to step in as at least a
> designated reviewer for that)

I suggest Alan to be the reviewer if that's okay for him :)