Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Variscite i.MX6ULZ board variants

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 01/10/2026 11:10, Stefano Radaelli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 10:09:22AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:17:30PM +0200, Stefano Radaelli wrote:
>>> +          - const: variscite,dart-6ul-imx6ulz
>>> +          - const: fsl,imx6ull
>>> +          - const: fsl,imx6ulz
>>
>> Is this the right order? Which one is superset of which?
>>
> 
> I followed the compatible order used by the existing i.MX6ULZ EVK
> and had also noticed the comment questioning whether `fsl,imx6ull`
> should come last.
> On review, I agree: i.MX6ULZ is the reduced-feature variant, while
> i.MX6ULL is the more general compatible.
> We can use `fsl,imx6ulz` followed by `fsl,imx6ull` for the new

Yes

> Variscite entries. I can also propose a separate patch to update
> the existing EVK compatible order to match, what do you think?

That probably should stay as is, because there could be a user checking
last fallback. Shouldn't, but could be.

Best regards,
Krzysztof