Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] iio: imu: inv_icm42607: Implement MREGx register access

From: Andy Shevchenko

Date: Fri Oct 02 2026 - 09:24:52 EST


On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 01:54:29PM +0200, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
> The device supports indirect register access to different banks. A
> specific routine needs to be followed when accessing the registers in
> another bank as documented in the datasheet (section 13). This is
> required for accessing registers configured via the user and
> implementing buffer support. The implementation is inspired from the
> icm45600 driver. The banks are defined based on their initial bank
> access code which are written to the BLK_SEL_* regs. However, there is a
> variation for MREG1 as User Bank 0 and MREG1 both share the same 0x00,
> so User Bank 1 has 0x00 and MREG1 has 0x01. When MREG1 register is
> accessed, then BLK_SEL_* is written with 0x00 instead of 0x01. All the
> register access goes through the 16 bit virtual regmap layered on top of
> the 8bit bus regmap. Bank id in the upper byte and the register address
> in the lower byte. Bank 0 accesses are forwarded to the bus regmap with
> the bank field stripped, while MREG accesses are forwarded to bank
> switching sequence.

...

> + unsigned int val;
> + int ret, ret2;
> +
> + *idle_set = false;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_MCLK_RDY, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (val & INV_ICM42607_MCLK_RDY_BIT)
> + return 0;

Why not regmap_test_bits()?

> + /*
> + * Clock isn't running: we're either in Sleep mode or in Accel LP mode
> + * running on WUOSC. Force the RC oscillator on via IDLE and wait for
> + * MCLK_RDY. Datasheet gives 10us (accel startup) to 200us (accel
> + * transition from OFF) for this to complete.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_set_bits(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_PWR_MGMT0,
> + INV_ICM42607_PWR_MGMT0_IDLE);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *idle_set = true;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_MCLK_RDY, val,
> + val & INV_ICM42607_MCLK_RDY_BIT, 10, 200);
> + if (ret) {
> + ret2 = regmap_clear_bits(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_PWR_MGMT0,
> + INV_ICM42607_PWR_MGMT0_IDLE);
> + if (ret2)
> + dev_err(regmap_get_device(map),
> + "failed to clear IDLE after MCLK timeout: %d\n", ret2);

Broken indentation.
Is it really important message?

> + else
> + *idle_set = false;
> }

...

> +static void inv_icm42607_mclk_put(struct regmap *map, bool idle_set)
> {
> + if (idle_set)
> + regmap_clear_bits(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_PWR_MGMT0,
> + INV_ICM42607_PWR_MGMT0_IDLE);
> +}

What about

if (!idle_set)
return;

regmap_clear_bits(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_PWR_MGMT0, INV_ICM42607_PWR_MGMT0_IDLE);

?

...

> +static int inv_icm42607_mreg_read(struct regmap *map, unsigned int reg,
> + u8 *data, size_t count)
> +{
> + unsigned int val;
> + bool idle_set;
> + u8 blk_sel;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* MREG access is one byte per transaction, no burst support. */
> + if (count != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = inv_icm42607_blk_sel(reg, &blk_sel);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = inv_icm42607_mclk_get(map, &idle_set);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

> + ret = regmap_write(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_BLK_SEL_R, blk_sel);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;

So, can we use regmap ranges instead?

> + ret = regmap_write(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_MADDR_R,
> + FIELD_GET(INV_ICM42607_REG_ADDR_MASK, reg));
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + fsleep(INV_ICM42607_MREG_ACCESS_DELAY_US);
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_M_R, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + fsleep(INV_ICM42607_MREG_ACCESS_DELAY_US);
> +
> + *data = val;
> +out:
> + /* Restore direct access. */
> + ret = regmap_write(map, INV_ICM42607_REG_BLK_SEL_R, 0);
> + inv_icm42607_mclk_put(map, idle_set);
> +
> + return ret;
> }

...

> +static const struct regmap_config inv_icm42607_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,

No cache? Why?

> +};

...

> +static const struct regmap_config inv_icm42607_regmap_config = {
> + .reg_bits = 8,
> + .val_bits = 8,
> +};

Ditto. And why they can't be deduplicated?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko