Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] sparc64: add seccomp filter support
From: Andreas Larsson
Date: Wed Oct 07 2026 - 02:19:10 EST
On 2026-09-02 09:27, Stian Halseth wrote:
> This adds SECCOMP_FILTER support for sparc64.
>
> The arch prerequisites have been in place for years, so patch 1 is
> mostly about the missing piece: letting seccomp veto a syscall, and
> returning to user space with the return value the seccomp core set in
> pt_regs rather than the -ENOSYS the assembler stubs used to force on
> any denied syscall. Patch 2 teaches the seccomp_bpf selftest to
> drive sparc64's registers.
>
> Tested on an UltraSPARC T4-1 (sun4v):
>
> - tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf: 95 passed, 0 failed,
> 16 skipped (uprobes and other optional features)
> - libseccomp with its pending SPARC support (libseccomp PR #471)
> passes its full suite, 5190 of 5190, including the live tests
> that require kernel SECCOMP_FILTER
> - docker containers run confined by the default profile, and a
> custom SCMP_ACT_ERRNO profile denies as expected
>
> The libseccomp side is https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/471,
> and the tracking issue is https://github.com/sparclinux/issues/issues/11.
>
> v2: drop the local regs-struct definition in the selftest in favour of
> PTRACE_GETREGS64/PTRACE_SETREGS64 and the uapi struct pt_regs
> (Kees Cook); patch 1 unchanged.
>
> Stian Halseth (2):
> sparc64: add seccomp filter support
> selftests/seccomp: add sparc64 support
>
> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/include/asm/seccomp.h | 15 ++++++++
> arch/sparc/include/asm/syscall.h | 11 +++---
> arch/sparc/kernel/entry.h | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/ptrace_64.c | 28 ++++++++++-----
> arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls.S | 28 +++++++++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
Looks good to me, and selftests runs fine for me as well. Thanks! We have a soon
incoming patch set adding support for sparc32 as well on top of this.
Kees, are you ok with the selftest changes being taken through my tree?
Cheers,
Andreas