Re: [PATCH v9 00/18] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class
From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Wed Oct 07 2026 - 08:08:20 EST
On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 01:54:09PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 01:56:44AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 04:36:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 12:22:27AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 02:29:55PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 02:55:08PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > > PCI P2PDMA applies Request and Completion Redirect throughout both paths.
> > > > > > This misclassifies asymmetric and nested switches, and reports one answer
> > > > > > for every kind of TLP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Three ACS controls act on TLP attributes the client chooses rather than
> > > > > > on the topology: Translation Blocking and Direct Translated P2P act on
> > > > > > a Request's Address Type, and Completion Redirect skips Completions carrying
> > > > > > Relaxed Ordering.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Evaluate each direction at the path divergence, decide every class from the
> > > > > > one walk, and treat a client with ATS enabled as translating unless its
> > > > > > driver declares per-mapping ATS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This completes the P2PDMA side; dma-buf and mlx5 follow separately.
> > > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > > Leon Romanovsky (18):
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls
> > > > > > PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk
> > > > > > PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled
> > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of clients with ATS enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +-
> > > > > > Documentation/driver-api/pci/p2pdma.rst | 80 +++
> > > > > > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 15 +
> > > > > > drivers/pci/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > > drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 719 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 7 +-
> > > > > > drivers/pci/pci.h | 58 ++
> > > > > > drivers/pci/pci_acs_test.c | 860 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 6 +-
> > > > > > include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h | 12 +-
> > > > > > 10 files changed, 1687 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > base-commit: 08dbfad3f5040f5bdb6c529da20d6d4e81fefd72
> > > > > > change-id: 20260821-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-e72455e3a261
> > > > > > prerequisite-message-id: <20260830-batch-p2p-fixes-v1-0-5044e8dfbe2e@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: 6b25c7fcf164cdfc14e9fac5b908d97fcf6509d7
> > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: 0d083c281001365aae4b35544cf28891a6ab9a96
> > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: bfd9dabf271f3cc9a3a61f46387d20c20311363d
> > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: fad0275efc722830fc591509506c0a5e4f581073
> > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: 0c83bee688fec1f6d1564654df7c630fa6a4a978
> > > > >
> > > > > This seems like material for the PCI tree, but I'm not sure how to
> > > > > apply it. It doesn't apply cleanly on the current pci/p2pdma
> > > > > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/log/?h=p2pdma),
> > > > > which does contain your series from
> > > > > 20260830-batch-p2p-fixes-v1-0-5044e8dfbe2e@xxxxxxxxxx.
> > > > >
> > > > > I could probably fix the conflicts but I don't know why there should
> > > > > be conflicts, since the only commits on pci/p2pdma other than yours
> > > > > are a few trivial allow-list updates.
> > > >
> > > > So maybe this is related to these trivial updates, my series was based
> > > > on the clean p2pdma branch:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=fix-p2p-acs-v9
> > >
> > > Ah, yeah, it must be the allow-list additions that I have but you
> > > don't. I wouldn't have thought the offsets would have been a problem.
> >
> > It applies fine if I move the Haswell and Alibaba allowlist patches t
> > to the end so the base matches fix-p2p-acs-v9, thanks.
>
> Bjorn,
>
> It is unclear to me if I should to resend.
No need.