Re: [PATCH] KEYS: Protect user key quota access during instantiation
From: Cen Zhang
Date: Mon Oct 12 2026 - 09:57:27 EST
Hi Jarkko,
Sorry for the previous email — the line wrapping got a bit messy on my
side. Hope it was still readable :).
Best regards,
Cen
Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@xxxxxxxxx> 于2026年10月12日周一 21:30写道:
>
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> Thanks very much for the detailed feedback and for your patience with this :).
>
> Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2026年10月12日周一 21:03写道:
> >
> >
> > I appreciate the fix but if I'm completely hones the commit message
> > looks like direct LLM output, which is not acceptable.
> >
> > It needs to be proof-readed and edited. For this reason, I want a better
> > iteration before I apply this.
> >
> > Br, Jarkko
>
> Thanks very much for the detailed feedback and for your patience with this.
>
> Several people have mentioned that my commit messages look like they were
> generated by an LLM — and to be honest, I did write them with LLM assistance.
> However, they often gave me the feeling of being questioned rather
> than explained.
> I spend most of my time looking for bugs, following my interest, so
> I’m more familiar
> with bug patterns than with the deeper details of the subsystem. That
> means I can
> make mistakes. I’m willing to listen to feedback and keep revising the
> patch until it’s in
> good shape, but the pressure sometimes makes me afraid to continue the
> conversation,
> worried about making more mistakes. Your patient explanation this time
> really means a
> lot to me.
>
> Of course, I also fully understand that busy developers feel
> uncomfortable when seeing
> unclear or poorly written messages. I just wanted to express my thanks
> for taking the time
> to gently and patiently explain things clearly.
>
> I’ll carefully rework the commit message following your suggestions to
> make the concurrency
> scenario and the reasoning clearer, and send a new patch once it’s
> ready. I’d appreciate it if
> you could take another look then.
>
> Best regards,
> Cen Zhang