Re: [PATCH 4/5] can: peak_usb: validate channel numbers in PCAN-USB FD

[Stéphane Grosjean]

Thank you so much for your help, Marc. I really appreciate it.

Best regards,

-- Stéphane

----- Mail original -----
> On 12.10.2026 11:04:56, Stéphane Grosjean wrote:
> > I need help (or training) to figure out how to deal with these AI
> > bots:
> >
> > - How many of them are there before the changes are accepted? It
> > seems
> >   that even if a patch has passed the Sashiko filter, we should
> >   still
> >   expect feedback from other bots...
> 
> There's https://sashiko.dev/ , which replies within minutes (as long
> as
> you don't include the netdev mailing list).
> 
> And there's https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/, which embargoes the
> review for ~24h, but runs several LLMs with better models.
> 
> > - The fact that there are multiple levels of bots isn’t a problem
> > in
> >   itself, and is understandable. That feedback arrives on v1 even
> >   though
> >   v2 has already been analysed is also something I’m just learning:
> >   so
> >   when can we consider it safe to push a new version without fear
> >   of
> >   receiving comments on the previous one?
> 
> Maybe you can mark the v1 as obsolete yourself with replying "pw-bot:
> cr".
> On a new line, without quotation marks, see:
> 
> https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/blob/main/mailbot.rst
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status
> https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/blob/e03d912ce66fd5d427cb9cf900409e1abc6eeba2/mailbot.py#L52-L81
> 
> > - And finally, providing more explicit comments on our changes is
> > also
> >   a good thing. But when those comments themselves become a source
> >   of
> >   problems and rejections—due to an overly nitpicky interpretation
> >   by a
> >   bot—it becomes far too time-consuming:
> 
> yes known problem :/
> 
> regards,
> Marc
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
> Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |
>