Re: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with the mm tree

[Muchun Song]

> On Oct 13, 2026, at 10:01, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:59:22 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:
>> 
>>  arch/riscv/mm/init.c
>> 
>> between commit:
>> 
>>  f02f1d1437449 ("riscv/mm: fix hotplug page-table destructor handling")
>> 
>> from the mm tree and commit:
>> 
>>  79113093e9dc3 ("riscv: convert pgtable_l4|l5_enabled to inline function")
>> 
>> from the risc-v tree.
>> 
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> diff --combined arch/riscv/mm/init.c
>> index 6f6b04795bb23,e2b738ca90cf3..0000000000000
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> 
> Well that's ugly.
> 
> I'll disable "riscv/mm: fix hotplug page-table destructor handling" for
> now to make this go away.
> 
> A decent approach would be to add that patch via the riscv tree.  Muchun,
> please confirm that this has no dependencies on anything else?

Hi Andrew,

Unfortunately, this fix depends on the first patch. So they should go through
MM tree together.

> 
> Otherwise I'll leave it disabled and revisit after -rc1.

I think this is OK.

Thanks.