Re: [BUG] Apparent lost wakeups
From: Vincent Guittot
Date: Tue Oct 13 2026 - 03:58:45 EST
On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 at 08:46, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/13/2026 11:36 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> >> The following command reproduces the lost-wakeup problem, which shows
> >> up as RCU CPU stall warnings caused by rcu_torture_reader() kthreads:
> >>
> >> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 20m --configs '19*TREE01' --bootargs "nohz=off rcutorture.onoff_interval=0 rcutorture.nocbs_nthreads=0 rcutorture.shuffle_interval=0" --trust-make
> >
> > tl;dr
> >
> > I could hit that WARN_ON() from your debug patch with the above test
> > even under rq_lock. Seemed like a missing resched_curr() but it
> > turned out to also be related to rq->next_class interaction.
> >
> > I haven't been able to hit the warnings with the below diff. Could
> > you please try this:
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 0f63c30b4324..f2f8af3cdfb5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -11239,6 +11245,11 @@ void sched_change_end(struct sched_change_ctx *ctx)
> > if (p->sched_class->switched_to)
> > p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p);
> >
> > + if (ctx->queued && sched_class_above(p->sched_class, rq->next_class)) {
> > + rq->next_class = p->sched_class;
> > + resched_curr(rq);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (ctx->running) {
> > /*
> > * If this was a class promotion; let the old class
> > ---
>
> And now that I've finally woken up just like that task, it can be
> simplified to:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 0f63c30b4324..b37c771c41ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -11256,6 +11262,9 @@ void sched_change_end(struct sched_change_ctx *ctx)
if (ctx->running) {
/*
* If this was a class promotion; let the old class
* know it got preempted. Note that none of the
* switch*_from() methods know the new class and none
* of the switch*_to() methods know the old class.
*/
if (sched_class_above(p->sched_class, ctx->class)) {
rq->next_class->wakeup_preempt(rq, p, 0);
rq->next_class = p->sched_class;
}
/*
* If this was a degradation in class; make sure to
* reschedule.
> */
> if (sched_class_above(ctx->class, p->sched_class))
> resched_curr(rq);
> + } else if (ctx->queued) {
> + /* Check if we need can preempt the current task. */
> + wakeup_preempt(rq, p, 0);
Isn't what we have for ctx->running above what we also want in this case ?
Then sched_balance_newidle() will detect it with
/* If a higher prio class was modified, restart the pick */
if (rq_modified_above(this_rq, &fair_sched_class))
pulled_task = -1;
> }
> } else {
> p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, ctx->prio);
> ---
>
> Peter, what do you think?
> > Lightly tested with TREE01 which passes without complains after
> > adding the above diff. Your mileage may vary :-)
>
> That disclaimer still applies.
>
> P.S. This is the output I see with the fix on my 512 CPUs machine
> and 64*TREE01. I hope this is the expected stuff:
>
> TREE01 ------- 34879 GPs (29.0658/s) [rcu: g238089 f0x0 total-gps=59806]
> TREE01.10 ------- 33788 GPs (28.1567/s) [rcu: g234153 f0x0 total-gps=58824]
> TREE01.11 ------- 35987 GPs (29.9892/s) [rcu: g245677 f0x0 total-gps=61702]
> TREE01.12 ------- 34864 GPs (29.0533/s) [rcu: g239025 f0x0 total-gps=60039]
> TREE01.13 ------- 34143 GPs (28.4525/s) [rcu: g234145 f0x0 total-gps=58821]
> TREE01.14 ------- 34603 GPs (28.8358/s) [rcu: g238249 f0x0 total-gps=59848]
> TREE01.15 ------- 34654 GPs (28.8783/s) [rcu: g236633 f0x0 total-gps=59444]
> TREE01.16 ------- 34714 GPs (28.9283/s) [rcu: g236617 f0x0 total-gps=59438]
> TREE01.17 ------- 33838 GPs (28.1983/s) [rcu: g233041 f0x0 total-gps=58545]
> TREE01.18 ------- 34119 GPs (28.4325/s) [rcu: g232869 f0x0 total-gps=58502]
> TREE01.19 ------- 34087 GPs (28.4058/s) [rcu: g234413 f0x0 total-gps=58888]
> TREE01.2 ------- 33669 GPs (28.0575/s) [rcu: g231649 f0x0 total-gps=58198]
> TREE01.20 ------- 33240 GPs (27.7/s) [rcu: g228757 f0x0 total-gps=57475]
> TREE01.21 ------- 33656 GPs (28.0467/s) [rcu: g230577 f0x0 total-gps=57929]
> TREE01.22 ------- 34505 GPs (28.7542/s) [rcu: g233817 f0x0 total-gps=58741]
> TREE01.23 ------- 35031 GPs (29.1925/s) [rcu: g239141 f0x0 total-gps=60071]
> TREE01.24 ------- 34771 GPs (28.9758/s) [rcu: g237589 f0x0 total-gps=59683]
> TREE01.25 ------- 33751 GPs (28.1258/s) [rcu: g229969 f0x0 total-gps=57778]
> TREE01.26 ------- 35695 GPs (29.7458/s) [rcu: g244333 f0x0 total-gps=61369]
> TREE01.27 ------- 33001 GPs (27.5008/s) [rcu: g227229 f0x0 total-gps=57093]
> TREE01.28 ------- 33399 GPs (27.8325/s) [rcu: g230181 f0x0 total-gps=57830]
> TREE01.29 ------- 34602 GPs (28.835/s) [rcu: g235361 f0x0 total-gps=59125]
> TREE01.3 ------- 35795 GPs (29.8292/s) [rcu: g243365 f0x0 total-gps=61126]
> TREE01.30 ------- 34129 GPs (28.4408/s) [rcu: g233673 f0x0 total-gps=58704]
> TREE01.31 ------- 34713 GPs (28.9275/s) [rcu: g236941 f0x0 total-gps=59521]
> TREE01.32 ------- 33953 GPs (28.2942/s) [rcu: g233017 f0x0 total-gps=58540]
> TREE01.33 ------- 34353 GPs (28.6275/s) [rcu: g234397 f0x0 total-gps=58885]
> TREE01.34 ------- 34836 GPs (29.03/s) [rcu: g238653 f0x0 total-gps=59948]
> TREE01.35 ------- 33714 GPs (28.095/s) [rcu: g232241 f0x0 total-gps=58344]
> TREE01.36 ------- 34704 GPs (28.92/s) [rcu: g236349 f0x0 total-gps=59373]
> TREE01.37 ------- 34205 GPs (28.5042/s) [rcu: g232549 f0x0 total-gps=58424]
> TREE01.38 ------- 33833 GPs (28.1942/s) [rcu: g232017 f0x0 total-gps=58292]
> TREE01.39 ------- 34001 GPs (28.3342/s) [rcu: g233089 f0x0 total-gps=58558]
> TREE01.4 ------- 35768 GPs (29.8067/s) [rcu: g243141 f0x0 total-gps=61069]
> TREE01.40 ------- 35209 GPs (29.3408/s) [rcu: g239941 f0x0 total-gps=60272]
> TREE01.41 ------- 34950 GPs (29.125/s) [rcu: g237825 f0x0 total-gps=59743]
> TREE01.42 ------- 34396 GPs (28.6633/s) [rcu: g234305 f0x0 total-gps=58863]
> TREE01.43 ------- 33162 GPs (27.635/s) [rcu: g227049 f0x0 total-gps=57046]
> TREE01.44 ------- 34965 GPs (29.1375/s) [rcu: g238837 f0x0 total-gps=59994]
> TREE01.45 ------- 33531 GPs (27.9425/s) [rcu: g229529 f0x0 total-gps=57665]
> TREE01.46 ------- 34167 GPs (28.4725/s) [rcu: g235829 f0x0 total-gps=59242]
> TREE01.47 ------- 34538 GPs (28.7817/s) [rcu: g236357 f0x0 total-gps=59375]
> TREE01.48 ------- 34491 GPs (28.7425/s) [rcu: g235029 f0x0 total-gps=59042]
> TREE01.49 ------- 36278 GPs (30.2317/s) [rcu: g245997 f0x0 total-gps=61784]
> TREE01.5 ------- 35415 GPs (29.5125/s) [rcu: g240741 f0x0 total-gps=60471]
> TREE01.50 ------- 34928 GPs (29.1067/s) [rcu: g236977 f0x0 total-gps=59529]
> TREE01.51 ------- 33065 GPs (27.5542/s) [rcu: g226573 f0x0 total-gps=56929]
> TREE01.52 ------- 34111 GPs (28.4258/s) [rcu: g234373 f0x0 total-gps=58878]
> TREE01.53 ------- 35627 GPs (29.6892/s) [rcu: g242797 f0x0 total-gps=60985]
> TREE01.54 ------- 33155 GPs (27.6292/s) [rcu: g227505 f0x0 total-gps=57160]
> TREE01.55 ------- 34386 GPs (28.655/s) [rcu: g233137 f0x0 total-gps=58571]
> TREE01.56 ------- 35130 GPs (29.275/s) [rcu: g237817 f0x0 total-gps=59740]
> TREE01.57 ------- 34660 GPs (28.8833/s) [rcu: g236409 f0x0 total-gps=59389]
> TREE01.58 ------- 34901 GPs (29.0842/s) [rcu: g236937 f0x0 total-gps=59521]
> TREE01.59 ------- 34915 GPs (29.0958/s) [rcu: g238425 f0x0 total-gps=59892]
> TREE01.6 ------- 35682 GPs (29.735/s) [rcu: g239305 f0x0 total-gps=60112]
> TREE01.60 ------- 34643 GPs (28.8692/s) [rcu: g235361 f0x0 total-gps=59126]
> TREE01.61 ------- 34343 GPs (28.6192/s) [rcu: g234857 f0x0 total-gps=58999]
> TREE01.62 ------- 34592 GPs (28.8267/s) [rcu: g233665 f0x0 total-gps=58703]
> TREE01.63 ------- 35315 GPs (29.4292/s) [rcu: g239865 f0x0 total-gps=60250]
> TREE01.64 ------- 34793 GPs (28.9942/s) [rcu: g240109 f0x0 total-gps=60311]
> TREE01.7 ------- 34171 GPs (28.4758/s) [rcu: g233977 f0x0 total-gps=58779]
> TREE01.8 ------- 33806 GPs (28.1717/s) [rcu: g233497 f0x0 total-gps=58659]
> TREE01.9 ------- 34083 GPs (28.4025/s) [rcu: g237765 f0x0 total-gps=59727]
> --- Done at Tue Oct 13 06:44:58 AM UTC 2026 (22:16.0) exitcode 0
>
> I miss those days where I could just turn around and ask Neeraj
> if this was correct at the office!
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prateek
>