Re: [PATCH] ACPI: battery: Re-read battery information in the complete callback

[Ali Ahmet Memiş]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 01:58:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote:
> An alternative might be to introduce an "exclusive" variant of
> acpi_evaluate_object() with built-in locking and use it in the cases
> that are known-problematic.

An exclusive variant would have to be used on both sides here, for
_BIX/_BST and for the INT3403 _TMP, since it is \GTST in _TMP that
switches the page.  I can do that and test it the same way.

Should this patch still go in for the regression meanwhile?