[PATCH v5 2/2] riscv: kprobes: add KUnit test for LR/SC sequence rejection
From: Xiaofeng Yuan
Date: Wed Oct 14 2026 - 05:57:48 EST
Extend the kprobes KUnit test with a function containing an LR/SC
sequence and assert that register_kprobe() accepts a probe placed right
before or right after the sequence, and rejects a probe placed on the
LR, on an instruction inside the sequence, or on the SC.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yuan <yuanxiaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S | 24 +++++++++++++++++
.../riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
.../riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S
index 15e50934b..6625a960c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S
@@ -100,6 +100,21 @@ test_kprobes_branch_addr8:
.option pop
SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_branch)
+SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_lrsc)
+.Llrsc_before:
+ nop
+1:
+.Llrsc_lr:
+ lr.w t0, 0(x0)
+.Llrsc_inside:
+ addi t0, t0, 1
+.Llrsc_sc:
+ sc.w t0, t0, 0(x0)
+ bnez t0, 1b
+.Llrsc_after:
+ ret
+SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_lrsc)
+
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_c_j)
@@ -253,3 +268,12 @@ SYM_DATA_START(test_kprobes_functions)
#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C */
RISCV_PTR 0
SYM_DATA_END(test_kprobes_functions)
+
+.section .rodata
+SYM_DATA_START(test_kprobes_lrsc_offsets)
+ RISCV_PTR .Llrsc_before
+ RISCV_PTR .Llrsc_lr
+ RISCV_PTR .Llrsc_inside
+ RISCV_PTR .Llrsc_sc
+ RISCV_PTR .Llrsc_after
+SYM_DATA_END(test_kprobes_lrsc_offsets)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c
index 027424a3f..272753756 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c
@@ -43,8 +43,34 @@ static void test_kprobe_riscv(struct kunit *test)
kfree(kp);
}
+static void test_kprobe_lrsc(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /*
+ * test_kprobes_lrsc_offsets[] points, in order, at an instruction
+ * right before an LR/SC sequence, the LR itself, an instruction
+ * inside the sequence, the SC, and an instruction right after it.
+ */
+ bool reject[] = { false, true, true, true, false };
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(reject); i++) {
+ struct kprobe kp = {};
+
+ kp.pre_handler = kprobe_dummy_handler;
+ kp.addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)test_kprobes_lrsc_offsets[i];
+
+ if (reject[i]) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, register_kprobe(&kp), 0);
+ } else {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, register_kprobe(&kp), 0);
+ unregister_kprobe(&kp);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static struct kunit_case kprobes_testcases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(test_kprobe_riscv),
+ KUNIT_CASE(test_kprobe_lrsc),
{}
};
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h
index 537f44aa9..65a8e7217 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ extern void *test_kprobes_addresses[];
/* array of functions that return KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC */
extern long (*test_kprobes_functions[])(void);
+/* offsets of the probe points inside test_kprobes_lrsc() */
+extern void *test_kprobes_lrsc_offsets[];
+
#endif /* __ASSEMBLER__ */
#endif /* TEST_KPROBES_H */
--
2.34.1