Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Print verified instruction count in prog show
From: Justin Suess
Date: Fri Oct 16 2026 - 10:23:28 EST
On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 03:16:57PM +0800, chenyuan_fl@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The number of instructions processed by the verifier is available
> through bpf_prog_info::verified_insns and the program's fdinfo since
> commit aba64c7da983 ("bpf: Add verified_insns to bpf_prog_info and
> fdinfo"), but bpftool does not display it, leaving no convenient way
> to check a program's verifier cost.
>
> Print the count in the plain and JSON output of bpftool prog show,
> following the convention of the other conditional stats
> (run_time_ns, run_cnt, recursion_misses): kernels that do not fill
> the field leave it zeroed and nothing is printed.
>
Reviewed-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@xxxxxxxxx>
This patch on it's own looks good to me.
Maybe it would be useful to print subprog count as well? Useful for
analyzing programs.
This looks like it would work to get subprog count regardless of whether
JIT was enabled.
static __u32 prog_subprog_cnt(const struct bpf_prog_info *info)
{
if (info->jited_prog_len)
return info->nr_jited_ksyms; /* exact, BTF or not */
return info->nr_func_info; /* interpreter: only BTF knows; 0 = unknown */
}
Completely optional / don't have to include this if you don't want, just
a suggestion for another patch that could help show how many functions
are being subprog'd or inlined :)
Justin
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Chen <chenyuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst | 3 ++-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> index 8dbd34ef3d8b..d4a94e0737a9 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ EXAMPLES
>
> ::
>
> - 10: xdp name some_prog tag 005a3d2123620c8b gpl run_time_ns 81632 run_cnt 10
> + 10: xdp name some_prog tag 005a3d2123620c8b gpl run_time_ns 81632 run_cnt 10 verified_insns 528
> loaded_at 2017-09-29T20:11:00+0000 uid 0
> xlated 528B jited 370B memlock 4096B map_ids 10
> pids systemd(1)
> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ EXAMPLES
> "gpl_compatible": true,
> "run_time_ns": 81632,
> "run_cnt": 10,
> + "verified_insns": 528,
> "loaded_at": 1506715860,
> "uid": 0,
> "bytes_xlated": 528,
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> index eb077236d2ea..c77e871b8859 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
> @@ -441,6 +441,8 @@ static void print_prog_header_json(struct bpf_prog_info *info, int fd)
> }
> if (info->recursion_misses)
> jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "recursion_misses", info->recursion_misses);
> + if (info->verified_insns)
> + jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "verified_insns", info->verified_insns);
> }
>
> static void print_prog_json(struct bpf_prog_info *info, int fd, bool orphaned)
> @@ -526,6 +528,8 @@ static void print_prog_header_plain(struct bpf_prog_info *info, int fd)
> info->run_time_ns, info->run_cnt);
> if (info->recursion_misses)
> printf(" recursion_misses %llu", info->recursion_misses);
> + if (info->verified_insns)
> + printf(" verified_insns %u", info->verified_insns);
> printf("\n");
> }
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>