Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] mm: compaction: mTHP-friendly memory compaction

[Xueyuan Chen]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 08:14:08AM +0800, Bo Zhang wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This series improves memory compaction to better serve mTHP (multi-size
>THP) allocations, particularly for small orders like order-2 (16KB).
>The changes focus on the proactive (kcompactd) compaction path.
>
>Problem:
>
>The current proactive compaction targets COMPACTION_HPAGE_ORDER (order-9,
>2MB), which is unfriendly to mTHP in two ways:
>
>1. It migrates folios that already satisfy mTHP allocation needs. For
>   example, an order-2 folio is a valid mTHP page, yet compaction still
>   moves it around trying to form order-9 blocks. This is unnecessary
>   work and wastes energy.
>
>2. Compaction designed for 2MB huge pages is too heavyweight for mTHP.
>   mTHP allocations are frequent and only require small contiguous blocks
>   (e.g., 4 pages for order-2). A lighter-weight, mTHP-aware compaction
>   strategy is needed to reduce overhead and power consumption.
>
>Approach:
>
>This series makes four changes:
>
>1. Generalize the fragmentation score functions to accept an order
>   parameter. This is a pure refactor with no functional change; all
>   callers still pass COMPACTION_HPAGE_ORDER.
>
>2. Use the highest always-enabled mTHP order as the proactive compaction
>   target. Because a fragmentation score for a small order is naturally
>   much lower than for order-9 under the same fragmentation state, the
>   proactive watermark is scaled down in proportion to the target order;
>   otherwise a small order would almost never reach the trigger threshold.
>
>3. During proactive compaction (compact_memory), skip isolating folios
>   that already satisfy mTHP requirements, avoiding unnecessary migration
>   overhead.
>
>4. For non-costly mTHP orders, restrict proactive compaction to movable
>   (and CMA) pageblocks. Unmovable/reclaimable blocks are dominated by
>   non-migratable kernel allocations. scanning them wastes cycles because
>   a small order can be satisfied from movable blocks alone. Costly orders
>   keep scanning all blocks, since they are harder to form and benefit
>   from any migratable page available.
>
>Test setup:
>
>x86 host, arm64 cross-build (defconfig + CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y,
>CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5=y), booted with mem=4G. order-3 (32KB) mTHP is
>set to "always"; ext4 root mounted data=journal. The kernel build
>naturally fragments order-3 free memory during the run.
>
>Runtime (two defrag modes were tested, see Results):
>  echo always > .../hugepages-32kB/enabled
>  echo madvise > .../transparent_hugepage/defrag   # or: always
>  echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
>
>A background loop keeps proactiveness poked every 100ms so kcompactd
>re-evaluates promptly (its default 500ms interval is too coarse to catch
>the transient order-3 fragmentation peaks under this workload):
>
>  while true; do
>      echo 20 > /proc/sys/vm/compaction_proactiveness
>      sleep 0.1
>  done
>
>Workload: make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- vmlinux -j28
>5 rounds per configuration; each round: make clean + drop_caches, then
>counter deltas around the build. The baseline is the unmodified kernel.
>
>Results (5-round means). anon_fault_alloc is within 1% between kernels,
>so the fallback numbers are directly comparable.
>
>defrag=madvise:
>                              w/o patch     w/ patch    change
>  --------------------------  -----------  -----------  --------
>  anon_fault_alloc             14,307,597   14,401,699    +1%
>  anon_fault_fallback              97,701       40,975   -58%
>  fallback ratio                    0.68%        0.28%
>  compact_isolated              8,479,773    1,458,949   -83%
>  compact_migrate_scanned      78,198,828   22,900,359   -71%
>  kcompactd cpu (s)                    43            7   -84%
>  sys (kernel build)                6m34s        6m34s    ~0%
>
>defrag=always:
>                              w/o patch     w/ patch    change
>  --------------------------  -----------  -----------  --------
>  anon_fault_alloc             14,370,984   14,404,234    ~0%
>  anon_fault_fallback                 619          823
>  compact_stall                       979          585   -40%
>  compact_isolated              6,390,940    2,431,800   -62%
>  compact_migrate_scanned      86,171,095   46,339,911   -46%
>  kcompactd cpu (s)                    36           13   -62%
>  sys (kernel build)                6m34s        6m27s   -1.8%
>
>1. With defrag=madvise, the patch cuts mTHP fallback by 58% (ratio
>   0.68% -> 0.28%).
>
>2. With defrag=always, direct compaction already keeps fallback near
>   zero, and the patch instead cuts direct compaction stalls by 40%.
>
>In both cases the compaction is done far more cheaply (kcompactd CPU
>-62..84%, compact_isolated/scanned -46..83%).

Hi Bo,

With proactive compaction enabled, have you measured the change in power
consumption on Android devices after applying this patch series?

>
>Open questions:
>
>1. In skip_isolation_on_order() and elsewhere, the target order is read
>   from huge_anon_orders_always directly, since during proactive
>   compaction cc->order is -1 (via compact_memory) and there is no clean
>   way to plumb the mTHP order down. This variable can change under
>   userspace at any time, making the semantics fragile. Ideas on how to
>   pass the target order through the proactive path cleanly are welcome.
>
>2. The proactive watermark is scaled linearly by the target order
>   (wmark * order / COMPACTION_HPAGE_ORDER). This is empirical; a more
>   principled cross-order normalization of the fragmentation score would
>   be welcome.
>
>Changes since v1
>================
>
>The series is now scoped to the proactive compaction path only. Two
>patches from v1 were dropped, and two new mechanisms were added:
>
>- Dropped v1 patch 3 ("don't skip proactive compaction for non-costly
>  mTHP", i.e. running proactive compaction concurrently with kswapd).
>  Follow-up testing showed it lowered fallback mainly by driving extra
>  anonymous reclaim/swap rather than by better compaction; keeping the
>  original kswapd back-off avoids trading workingset for mTHP fallback.
>
>- Dropped v1 patch 4 (mTHP-aware zone_effective_free_pages() watermark):
>  it added reclaim pressure without a clear net benefit in this scope.
>
>- Split the former patch 1 into a pure refactor (parameterize the
>  fragmentation score by order) plus the mTHP-targeting change, so the
>  mechanical and behavioural parts can be reviewed independently.
>
>- Added the proactive watermark scaling by target order, so a small mTHP
>  order can actually reach the trigger threshold.
>
>- Added patch 4 (skip unmovable blocks for non-costly proactive mTHP
>  compaction). Without it, proactive compaction wastes most of its
>  scanning on unmovable blocks full of kernel allocations; with it,
>  kcompactd's CPU and the scanned/isolated counters drop by an order of
>  magnitude while fallback still improves.
>
>- compact_hpage_order() uses __fls() (highest always-enabled mTHP order)
>  guarded by #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE (m68k allmodconfig build
>  fix from the kernel test robot).
>
>- Refreshed test data on an mem=4G, order-3, data=journal kernel-build
>  workload; see Results above.
>
>Bo Zhang (4):
>  mm: compaction: parameterize fragmentation score by order
>  mm: compaction: target mTHP order for proactive compaction
>  mm: compaction: skip isolating large folios that already satisfy mTHP
>  mm: compaction: skip unmovable blocks for non-costly proactive mTHP
>    compaction
>
> mm/compaction.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>2.34.1
>
>