Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] watchdog: w83627hf_wdt: Move register offsets into driver data

[Tzung-Bi Shih]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 03:58:48PM +0200, Paul Louvel wrote:
> @@ -42,9 +42,6 @@
>  #define WATCHDOG_TIMEOUT 60		/* 60 sec default timeout */
>  
>  static int wdt_io;
> -static int cr_wdt_timeout;	/* WDT timeout register */
> -static int cr_wdt_control;	/* WDT control register */
> -static int cr_wdt_csr;		/* WDT control & status register */
...
> +struct w83627hf_reg {
> +	int control;
> +	int timeout;
> +	int csr;
> +};
> +
...
> +static const struct w83627hf_reg w83627hf_default_regs = {
> +	.control = W83627HF_WDT_CONTROL,
> +	.timeout = W83627HF_WDT_TIMEOUT,
> +	.csr = W836X7HF_WDT_CSR
> +};
> +
> +static const struct w83627hf_reg w83627hf_nct61xx_regs = {
> +	.timeout = NCT6102D_WDT_TIMEOUT,
> +	.control = NCT6102D_WDT_CONTROL,
> +	.csr = NCT6102D_WDT_CSR
> +};
> +
> +static const struct w83627hf_reg w83627hf_w83697xx_regs = {
> +	.timeout = W83697HF_WDT_TIMEOUT,
> +	.control = W83697HF_WDT_CONTROL,
> +	.csr = W836X7HF_WDT_CSR
> +};

Nit: the order is inconsistent.  It would be better to stick with
the order timeout -> control -> csr.

> @@ -489,6 +499,21 @@ static int wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	wdd->min_timeout = 1;
>  	wdd->max_timeout = 255;
>  
> +	switch (chip) {
> +	case nct6102:
> +	case nct6116:
> +	case nct6126:
> +		data->reg = &w83627hf_nct61xx_regs;
> +		break;
> +	case w83697hf:
> +	case w83697ug:
> +		data->reg = &w83627hf_w83697xx_regs;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		data->reg = &w83627hf_default_regs;
> +		break;
> +	};
         ^
Please remove the extra ';'.