Re: [PATCH v2] ntfs: handle a failed size rollback in the write error path
From: Hongling Zeng
Date: Mon Oct 19 2026 - 23:24:50 EST
在 2026年10月20日 10:54, Hyunchul Lee 写道:
Hi Hongling,Hi Hyunchul,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 02:49:18PM +0800, Hongling Zeng wrote:
>ntfs_file_write_iter() extends the data and initialized sizes beforeFor compressed-file, the code only emits a warning, which causes the
>it copies the user data and restores them when the write then fails.
>The restoration is best-effort: both results are discarded, even
>though the extension is already recorded in the dirty MFT record.
>When the restoration fails too, the extended sizes reach the disk
>while the VFS inode keeps reporting the old ones: after a remount the
>file appears grown again, with an uninitialized tail where the failed
>write never put any data, and nothing records the failure.
>
>Keep both undo results: on failure, set NVolSetErrors(), which the next
>persistence point persists as VOLUME_IS_DIRTY, and log a message for
>the errors= policy.
>
>Fixes: 9c87959601e8 ("ntfs: update file operations")
>Suggested-by: Hyunchul Lee<hyc.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng<zenghongling@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
>Changes in v2:
>- do not roll the initialized size back on a resident data attribute,
> where ntfs_attr_set_initialized_size() always fails with -EINVAL and
> the data size rollback restores both coupled sizes.
>---
> fs/ntfs/file.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
>index d810ca5904bd..597fd70ed30b 100644
>--- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
>+++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
>@@ -934,22 +934,50 @@ ssize_t ntfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> &ntfs_iomap_folio_ops, NULL);
> out:
> if (ret < 0 && ret != -EIOCBQUEUED) {
>- if (ni->initialized_size != old_init_size) {
>- struct ntfs_inode *mrec_ni =
>- ntfs_base_inode(ni);
>+ int undo_err = 0;
>+ int init_err = 0;
>+
>+ /* ntfs_attr_set_initialized_size() rejects a resident one. */
>+ if (ni->initialized_size != old_init_size &&
>+ NInoNonResident(ni)) {
>+ struct ntfs_inode *mrec_ni = ntfs_base_inode(ni);
> > mutex_lock(&mrec_ni->mrec_lock);
>- ntfs_attr_set_initialized_size(ni, old_init_size);
>+ init_err = ntfs_attr_set_initialized_size(ni,
>+ old_init_size);
> mutex_unlock(&mrec_ni->mrec_lock);
>+ if (init_err && !undo_err)
>+ undo_err = init_err;
> }
> if (ni->data_size != old_data_size) {
>- struct ntfs_inode *mrec_ni =
>- ntfs_base_inode(ni);
>+ struct ntfs_inode *mrec_ni = ntfs_base_inode(ni);
>+ int data_err = 0;
> > truncate_setsize(vi, old_data_size);
>- mutex_lock(&mrec_ni->mrec_lock);
>- ntfs_attr_truncate(ni, old_data_size);
>- mutex_unlock(&mrec_ni->mrec_lock);
>+ /*
>+ * ntfs_attr_truncate() rejects a compressed one.
>+ * Skip it also after a failed initialized size
>+ * rollback: the shrunk data size would stay below
>+ * the initialized size, which the loader rejects.
>+ */
>+ if (!NInoCompressed(ni) && !init_err) {
>+ mutex_lock(&mrec_ni->mrec_lock);
>+ data_err = ntfs_attr_truncate(ni,
>+ old_data_size);
>+ mutex_unlock(&mrec_ni->mrec_lock);
>+ }
>+ if (data_err && !undo_err)
>+ undo_err = data_err;
>+ }
>+ if (ni->data_size != old_data_size && NInoCompressed(ni))
>+ ntfs_warning(vi->i_sb,
VOLUME_IS_DIRTY persistence to be bypassed even though the MFT data size
remains expanded.
I think that we should report the compressed rollback as an error.
-- Thanks, Hyunchul
You are right, the warning-only path left the expanded data size with
no error state. v3 drops the skip: the data size rollback now goes
through __ntfs_attr_truncate_vfs(), the same entry ntfs_setattr_size()
uses, which also supports compressed attributes. The compressed
rollback is performed rather than skipped, and a failure of either
undo sets NVolSetErrors() and calls ntfs_error().
Thanks,
Hongling