Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm tree with the origin tree

From: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)

Date: Wed Oct 21 2026 - 10:55:04 EST


On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 04:44:36PM +0200, Magnus Lindholm wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 3:42 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mm tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/alpha/Kconfig
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 0d4c9dd06c364 ("alpha: select SPARSE_IRQ")
> >
> > from the origin tree and commit:
> >
> > 35e340a47888e ("mm: userland pgtable freeing is RCU-safe now, remove leftover bits")
> >
> > from the mm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > diff --cc arch/alpha/Kconfig
> > index 8fafbfabd1e51,9063c7bda4e41..0000000000000
> > --- a/arch/alpha/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/alpha/Kconfig
> > @@@ -71,10 -42,7 +71,9 @@@ config ALPH
> > select ARCH_STACKWALK
> > select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !ALPHA_EV67
> > select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE
> > - select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> > + select SPARSE_IRQ
> > select SPARSEMEM_EXTREME if SPARSEMEM
> > + select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
> > select ZONE_DMA
> > select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
> > select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
>
> The resolution looks correct to me. Thanks for resolving this.

Ack agreed, thanks!

>
> Regards,
>
> Magnus

--
Cheers, Lorenzo