Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] perf annotate arm64: Support instruction tracking for data type profiling

From: Tengda Wu

Date: Wed Oct 21 2026 - 21:19:55 EST




On 2026/10/22 7:46, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 06:48:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 09:18:38AM +0800, Tengda Wu wrote:
>>> On 2026/10/16 7:11, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>>> Please let me know if you have any feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your work! Assuming you'll fix the issues from Sashiko
>>>> in the next version, you can add my:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I'll address the issues reported by Sashiko and send a v8.
>>> Most of them are minor, and I'll fix them accordingly (or explain
>>> in the v8 thread if I think any of them is a false positive).
>>> I'll carry your Reviewed-by in the next version as agreed.
>>
>> I applied the first 5 patches that are sashiko-clean, will push soon to
>> tmp.perf-tools-next and then to perf-tools next after test building on
>> my containers.
>
> There is v8 already which should have addressed the concerns.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1792411435.git.wutengda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

Yes, applying based on v8 would be better. All Sashiko comments have been
addressed in v8, so the whole series can be applied and tested as-is.

Thanks a lot.

Best regards,
Tengda

> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>