Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: ptrace: don't warn on missing siginfo in a group-stop

From: Zhao Gongyi

Date: Sat Oct 24 2026 - 10:50:43 EST


On 10/23/26 9:24 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 10/23, Zhao Gongyi wrote:
>>
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -573,10 +573,6 @@ static void update_syscall_orig_x0_after_ptrace(struct task_struct *target)
>> if (regs->syscallno == NO_SYSCALL)
>> return;
>>
>> - /* We should only be called when target is in a ptrace stop */
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!info))
>> - return;
>> -
>> /*
>> * For compat tasks, orig_r0 is provided directly through GPR index
>> * 17.
>> @@ -588,7 +584,7 @@ static void update_syscall_orig_x0_after_ptrace(struct task_struct *target)
>> * Don't update orig_x0 for a syscall-exit-stop, as x0 now contains the
>> * return value of the system call.
>> */
>> - if ((info->si_code & ~0x80) == SIGTRAP &&
>> + if (info && (info->si_code & ~0x80) == SIGTRAP &&
>> target->ptrace_message == PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT) {
>> return;
>
> LGTM, but I don't understand this arm-specific code.
>
> And... Do we need to check target->last_siginfo at all?
>
> ptrace_signal() -> ptrace_stop() path sets ->ptrace_message = 0.
>
> In all other cases: if info != NULL, then .si_code == target->exit_code.
> ptrace_event(event) users always use event != 0 and != 0x80.
>
> So it seems that we can just do
>
> if ((target->exit_code & ~0x80) == SIGTRAP &&
> target->ptrace_message == PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT)
>
> ?
>
> I'll recheck... If I am right, perhaps it makes sense to simplify
> ptrace_get_syscall_info_op().
>

Hi Oleg,

Thanks for the review. I checked target->exit_code when the tracer calls
PTRACE_SETREGSET after waitpid(). It
was 0 at syscall-exit-stops both with and without PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD:
wait_task_stopped() clears it when
reporting the stop. last_siginfo still held the corresponding si_code (5
or 133).

I also used temporary kernel logging to check orig_x0 before and after
writing a distinct value to x0 at each
stop. orig_x0 remained unchanged in both cases. Using exit_code in this
condition would instead fall through
and copy the new x0 into orig_x0.

So I think we should keep the last_siginfo check in v2. The same
exit_code lifetime also seems relevant to
ptrace_get_syscall_info_op() after waitpid().

Thanks,
Gongyi