Re: [PATCH] docs: remove Assisted-by references
From: Joshua Peisach
Date: Mon Oct 26 2026 - 15:58:52 EST
On Fri Oct 9, 2026 at 4:31 AM EDT, Sasha Levin wrote:
The Maintainers Summit reached consensus to deprecate the Assisted-by
tag. Remove the documentation requiring it.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst | 21 +------------------
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 10 ---------
.../it_IT/process/submitting-patches.rst | 10 ---------
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 ----------
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
index 051f0d819f68e..509dbf23a099b 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst
@@ -40,24 +40,6 @@ is responsible for:
* Adding their own Signed-off-by tag to certify the DCO
* Taking full responsibility for the contribution
-Attribution
-===========
-
-When AI tools contribute to kernel development, proper attribution
-helps track the evolving role of AI in the development process.
-Contributions should include an Assisted-by tag in the following format::
-
- Assisted-by: LLM [TOOL1] [TOOL2]
-
-* ``[TOOL1] [TOOL2]`` are optional specialized analysis tools used
- (e.g., coccinelle, sparse, smatch, clang-tidy)
-
-Basic development tools (git, gcc, make, editors) should not be listed.
-
-Example::
-
- Assisted-by: LLM coccinelle sparse
-
Procedure for finding and fixing bugs
=====================================
@@ -82,8 +64,7 @@ these steps:
another one. The fix must not add build warnings and must pass the
checkpatch.pl checks (see submitting-patches.rst).
6. Commit the working fix with a detailed message describing the problem, the
- solution and a Fixes tag. Do not add a Signed-off-by tag, and add an
- Assisted-by tag, as described above.
+ solution and a Fixes tag. Do not add a Signed-off-by tag.
7. Identify the maintainers and lists using scripts/get_maintainer.pl.
Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst shows how to do that.
8. Indicate what could not be done. If the fix could not be built or tested, or
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index 7ae79452e1b46..5f4e0156cca78 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -632,16 +632,6 @@ bugzilla.kernel.org is a public place in this sense, but email addresses
used there are private; so do not expose them in tags, unless the person
used them in earlier contributions.
-Using Assisted-by:
-------------------
-
-If you used any sort of advanced coding tool in the creation of your patch,
-you need to acknowledge that use by adding an Assisted-by tag. Failure to
-do so may impede the acceptance of your work. Please see
-Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst for details regarding the
-acknowledgment of coding assistants.
-
-
.. _the_canonical_patch_format:
The canonical patch format
diff --git a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/submitting-patches.rst
index a742610cb0709..d0e0d6c9ecc2e 100644
--- a/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ un luogo pubblico, ma gli indirizzi email usati lì sono privati; quindi non
esponeteli nelle etichette, a meno che la persona non li abbia già usati in
contributi precedenti.
-Usare Assisted-by:
--------------------
-
-Se avete usato un qualsiasi tipo di strumento di assistenza avanzata alla
-scrittura del codice per la creazione della vostra patch, dovete darne atto
-aggiungendo un'etichetta Assisted-by. Non farlo può ostacolare
-l'accettazione del vostro lavoro. Fate riferimento a
-Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst per i dettagli su come dare
-atto dell'uso di assistenti alla scrittura del codice.
-
.. _it_the_canonical_patch_format:
Il formato canonico delle patch
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 8a7787d228a63..c9840f5219c2a 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -655,7 +655,6 @@ our $signature_tags = qr{(?xi:
Reviewed-by:|
Reported-by:|
Suggested-by:|
- Assisted-by:|
To:|
Cc:
)};
@@ -3124,16 +3123,6 @@ sub process {
}
}
- # Assisted-by uses a free-form value (e.g. "LLM"), not an
- # email address, so skip the email format checks below.
- if ($sign_off =~ /^Assisted-by:/i) {
- if ($email =~ /^\s*$/) {
- WARN("BAD_SIGN_OFF",
- "Assisted-by requires a value\n" . $herecurr);
- }
- next;
- }
-
my ($email_name, $name_comment, $email_address, $comment) = parse_email($email);
my $suggested_email = format_email(($email_name, $name_comment, $email_address, $comment));
if ($suggested_email eq "") {
While everyone has been discussing tags, no tags, etc, I want to bring
up that this, in a way, just lowered the bar *tremendously* for people
wanting to contribute to the kernel.
Because now that there is an AGENTS.md, and you don't have to say
whether you used AI, you can use it anyway and nobody will know.
And I wonder how the other kernel newbies who have been spending their
time *avoiding AI* for the purpose of learning how to actually
contribute to the kernel feel about this.
This will ultimately lead to people making their drive-by contributions
because they think it will buy them fame.
I have seen this in the video game decompilation scene, the current
console homebrew scene, and I am expecting it to come here now.
-Josh