Re: [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.5] sched_ext: Add NUMA balancing support

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 05:13:29AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:

> Ideally the ultimate goal is to give BPF schedulers both controls that
> NUMA balancing combines: moving a task to the node where its memory is
> and moving the memory a task uses to the node where the task runs. This
> series provides the first: with the preferred node available, a
> scheduler can decide where to run the task. A second series, to follow
> once this one lands, will provide the second: a kfunc that lets a
> scheduler request the node a task's memory should migrate to.

Fair has no real control over the memory migration part either; why
would you want to give BPF that?