Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: qcom-qusb2: describe autoresume bit

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On 2026-09-20 16:59 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> There is a confusion regarding the autoresume bit. Some verions of the
> QUSB2 PHY have it in the TEST1 register, while on the others it is a
> part of the TEST_CTRL register. When adding support for autoresume bit,
> the code attempted to simplify the handling of those registers, putting
> both registers to the TEST1 layout entry. In the end,
> ipq6018_regs_layout ended up correctly definig TEST1 register at 0x98
> (because platforms using that layout didn't use autoresume), while
> msm8996_regs_layout used TEST_CTRL offset (0xb8) for the TEST1
> layout entry.
> 
> Update the platform data to specify the register to be used for
> autoresume handling, define both TEST1 and TEST_CTRL registers and merge
> ipq6018_regs_layout and msm8996_regs_layout which become identical
> afterwards.
> 
> Fixes: 891a96f65ac3 ("phy: qcom-qusb2: Add support for runtime PM")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

With the commit message updated to mention the impact on Shikra:

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

- Mani