Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Add SM7250 RPMh NoC

[Ishu Brar]

On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 09:10:21 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/10/2026 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> +  clocks:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: aggre UFS PHY AXI clock
>>> +      - description: aggre USB3 PRIM AXI clock
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  '^interconnect-[0-9]+$':
>> 
>> We actually do not need to enforce -0: '^interconnect(-[0-9]+)?$'
>
> Actually is this really a pattern? How many children are there?

No, not a pattern. there is at most one child per provider:
	aggre2-noc  -> compute-noc
	gem-noc     -> mc-virt
	system-noc  -> qup-virt

The other providers have no child. v5 would replace the pattern with a
single fixed "interconnect" child node.

Should the binding also allow the child only under these three
providers (and "interconnect: false" for the rest), or is the plain
child node enough?

Ishu Brar